From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14224C6786C for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02D3214DE for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:13:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544789598; bh=wyNANDblERKyJXLqBuBHaKH/FzMh7hyUq3ng232NBV4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=P+qG3/INV/VWBC8mMwuLGAQkxT9Co8UG1eCxFz3EEz5cLtQLOVLBQSv4c2/NvuI3J oetu+L9OUkUNcNnWfCYHa0VS8NenDbOoo2UXxUxnVNy/yxgGwUWoBWXndkmG/p2mWH e+qXypbMup+40qYFRZ3ULfUOBtYn6ZeY8J53HMnU= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D02D3214DE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732100AbeLNMNR (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:13:17 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60732 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732086AbeLNMNN (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:13:13 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 585BB214E0; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:13:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544789592; bh=wyNANDblERKyJXLqBuBHaKH/FzMh7hyUq3ng232NBV4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=zK//gybuzDR31Lr7tLY79iyHGPPqRdxr8o8jvmyppc1HLcos2HOGmUjDmRXJqiVqu jmY5c17gqBlbv0QUM/ua1DgHOWX6qcGxoc8vETy0WSsB/1Bvned5568WjQE38LI5Fu 8NesUe/u0/I8YRrEhHSlIzMyzwc5DwgQaaDIkdn8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, "Y.C. Chen" , Dave Airlie , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.9 41/51] drm/ast: fixed reading monitor EDID not stable issue Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:00:43 +0100 Message-Id: <20181214115716.842801826@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.0 In-Reply-To: <20181214115713.244259772@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181214115713.244259772@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit 300625620314194d9e6d4f6dda71f2dc9cf62d9f ] v1: over-sample data to increase the stability with some specific monitors v2: refine to avoid infinite loop v3: remove un-necessary "volatile" declaration [airlied: fix two checkpatch warnings] Signed-off-by: Y.C. Chen Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1542858988-1127-1-git-send-email-yc_chen@aspeedtech.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_mode.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_mode.c index 57205016b04a..201874b96dd6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_mode.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_mode.c @@ -954,9 +954,21 @@ static int get_clock(void *i2c_priv) { struct ast_i2c_chan *i2c = i2c_priv; struct ast_private *ast = i2c->dev->dev_private; - uint32_t val; + uint32_t val, val2, count, pass; + + count = 0; + pass = 0; + val = (ast_get_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0x10) >> 4) & 0x01; + do { + val2 = (ast_get_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0x10) >> 4) & 0x01; + if (val == val2) { + pass++; + } else { + pass = 0; + val = (ast_get_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0x10) >> 4) & 0x01; + } + } while ((pass < 5) && (count++ < 0x10000)); - val = ast_get_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0x10) >> 4; return val & 1 ? 1 : 0; } @@ -964,9 +976,21 @@ static int get_data(void *i2c_priv) { struct ast_i2c_chan *i2c = i2c_priv; struct ast_private *ast = i2c->dev->dev_private; - uint32_t val; + uint32_t val, val2, count, pass; + + count = 0; + pass = 0; + val = (ast_get_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0x20) >> 5) & 0x01; + do { + val2 = (ast_get_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0x20) >> 5) & 0x01; + if (val == val2) { + pass++; + } else { + pass = 0; + val = (ast_get_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0x20) >> 5) & 0x01; + } + } while ((pass < 5) && (count++ < 0x10000)); - val = ast_get_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0x20) >> 5; return val & 1 ? 1 : 0; } @@ -979,7 +1003,7 @@ static void set_clock(void *i2c_priv, int clock) for (i = 0; i < 0x10000; i++) { ujcrb7 = ((clock & 0x01) ? 0 : 1); - ast_set_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0xfe, ujcrb7); + ast_set_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0xf4, ujcrb7); jtemp = ast_get_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0x01); if (ujcrb7 == jtemp) break; @@ -995,7 +1019,7 @@ static void set_data(void *i2c_priv, int data) for (i = 0; i < 0x10000; i++) { ujcrb7 = ((data & 0x01) ? 0 : 1) << 2; - ast_set_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0xfb, ujcrb7); + ast_set_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0xf1, ujcrb7); jtemp = ast_get_index_reg_mask(ast, AST_IO_CRTC_PORT, 0xb7, 0x04); if (ujcrb7 == jtemp) break; -- 2.19.1