Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/142] 4.19.10-stable review

Dan Rue
2018-12-17T13:56:38Z

On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 06:11:45PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:01:02AM -0600, Dan Rue wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:58:05PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.10 release.
> > > There are 142 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Sun Dec 16 11:57:12 UTC 2018.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > Regressions detected.
>
> They were?

My mistake. There were some false regressions that showed up and I was a
bit distracted when sending the reports and missed that.

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

>
> >
> > Summary
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > kernel: 4.19.10-rc1
> > git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > git branch: linux-4.19.y
> > git commit: 4875bf1f86d7bdc8dbf3222ab4028239446fab3f
> > git describe: v4.19.9-143-g4875bf1f86d7
> > Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.19-oe/build/v4.19.9-143-g4875bf1f86d7
> >
> > No regressions (compared to build v4.19.9)
> >
> > No fixes (compared to build v4.19.9)
> >
> > Ran 18346 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
>
> This said there were no regressions.
>
> confused,
>
> greg k-h