From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
keescook@chromium.org, bhe@redhat.com, msys.mizuma@gmail.com,
indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 2/5] x86/boot: Introduce efi_get_rsdp_addr() to find RSDP from EFI table
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 18:36:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181217173605.GA14613@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181217173032.GB90818@gmail.com>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > + if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_TABLE_GUID)))
> > + rsdp_addr = (acpi_physical_address)table;
> > + else if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID)))
> > + return (acpi_physical_address)table;
>
> 'return' is not a function.
Disregard this - I got confused by the type cast.
The type cast is ugly nevertheless. 'table' is an 'unsigned long'.
So 'acpi_physical_address' is basically an u64/u32, depending on
ACPI_MACHINE_WIDTH, right?
Since this is x86, can ACPI_MACHINE_WIDTH ever get out of sync with the
native 'unsigned long' size?
If not then why not make the return type 'unsigned long', instead of
'acpi_physical_address' that you have to wade through a couple of headers
to figure out its true size. Does that cause complications elsewhere?
I.e. the excessive type casts are ugly and make the code somewhat
fragile.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-17 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-14 9:30 [PATCH v14 0/5] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit KASLR to choosing immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-12-14 9:30 ` [PATCH v14 1/5] x86/boot: Introduce get_acpi_rsdp() to parse RSDP in cmdline from KEXEC Chao Fan
2018-12-17 17:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-17 18:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-12-17 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 1:27 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-18 11:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-19 1:18 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-14 9:30 ` [PATCH v14 2/5] x86/boot: Introduce efi_get_rsdp_addr() to find RSDP from EFI table Chao Fan
2018-12-17 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-17 17:36 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-12-25 7:43 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-17 18:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-12-17 18:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 1:45 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-14 9:30 ` [PATCH v14 3/5] x86/boot: Introduce bios_get_rsdp_addr() to search RSDP in memory Chao Fan
2018-12-17 17:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 2:28 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-14 9:30 ` [PATCH v14 4/5] x86/boot: Parse SRAT address from RSDP and store immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-12-17 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 3:17 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-14 9:30 ` [PATCH v14 5/5] x86/boot/KASLR: Limit KASLR to extracting kernel in " Chao Fan
2018-12-17 17:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 2:49 ` Chao Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181217173605.GA14613@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox