From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>,
Dmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] debugobjects: Move printk out of db lock critical sections
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 19:17:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181217181712.GA5114@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544738377-3848-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com>
* Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> wrote:
> The db->lock is a raw spinlock and so the lock hold time is supposed to
> be short. This will not be the case when printk() is being involved in
> some of the critical sections.
>
> In order to avoid the long hold time, in case some messages need to be
> printed, all the debug_object_is_on_stack() and debug_print_object()
> calls are now moved out of those critical sections in the following
> functions.
>
> - __debug_object_init()
> - debug_object_activate()
> - debug_object_deactivate()
> - debug_object_destroy()
> - debug_object_free()
> - debug_object_active_state()
> - __debug_check_no_obj_freed()
> - check_results()
>
> Holding the db->lock while calling printk() may lead to deadlock if
> printk() somehow requires the allocation/freeing of debug object that
> happens to be in the same hash bucket or a circular lock dependency
> warning from lockdep as reported in
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181211091154.GL23332@shao2-debian
This makes me sad - whatever happened to the principle of keeping printk
simple?
We should rename printk() to syslog() or so, and rename early_printk() to
printk(), and be done with this.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-17 18:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-13 21:59 [PATCH v2] debugobjects: Move printk out of db lock critical sections Waiman Long
2018-12-17 18:17 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-12-17 18:33 ` Waiman Long
2018-12-17 19:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-17 19:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-18 13:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 14:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-12-18 2:23 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181217181712.GA5114@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dima@arista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox