From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<keescook@chromium.org>, <bhe@redhat.com>,
<msys.mizuma@gmail.com>, <indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com>,
<caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 2/5] x86/boot: Introduce efi_get_rsdp_addr() to find RSDP from EFI table
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 09:45:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181218014526.GC31775@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181217173032.GB90818@gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 06:30:32PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>* Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
>> Memory information in SRAT is necessary to fix the conflict between
>> KASLR and memory-hotremove. So RSDP and SRAT should be parsed.
>>
>> When booting form KEXEC/EFI/BIOS, the methods to compute RSDP
>> are different. When booting from EFI, EFI table points to RSDP.
>> So parse the EFI table and find the RSDP.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
>> index 44f19546c169..4151881d8713 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/acpi.c
>> @@ -28,3 +28,82 @@ static acpi_physical_address get_acpi_rsdp(void)
>> #endif
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> +/* Search EFI table for RSDP. */
>> +static acpi_physical_address efi_get_rsdp_addr(void)
>> +{
>> + acpi_physical_address rsdp_addr = 0;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI
>> + efi_system_table_t *systab;
>> + struct efi_info *e;
>
>'e' is pretty meaningless, the canonical name for efi_info local
>variables is typically 'ei' (although this is not consistent across the
>code).
OK, will change it.
>
>> + bool efi_64;
>
>Is this a flag that shows whether the EFI loader is 64-bit?
Yes, I use the signature to decide the size of EFI table.
It's used here:
+ size = efi_64 ? sizeof(efi_config_table_64_t) :
+ sizeof(efi_config_table_32_t);
>
>> + char *sig;
>> + int size;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + e = &boot_params->efi_info;
>> + sig = (char *)&e->efi_loader_signature;
>> +
>> + if (!strncmp(sig, EFI64_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4)) {
>> + efi_64 = true;
>> + } else if (!strncmp(sig, EFI32_LOADER_SIGNATURE, 4)) {
>> + efi_64 = false;
>> + } else {
>> + debug_putstr("Wrong EFI loader signature.\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Get systab from boot params. Based on efi_init(). */
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> + systab = (efi_system_table_t *)(e->efi_systab | ((__u64)e->efi_systab_hi<<32));
>> +#else
>> + if (e->efi_systab_hi || e->efi_memmap_hi) {
>> + debug_putstr("Error getting RSDP address: EFI system table located above 4GB.\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + systab = (efi_system_table_t *)e->efi_systab;
>> +#endif
>> +
>> + if (!systab)
>> + return 0;
>
>Is it normal that EFI provides no 'systab'?
I think not normal, to make sure the code run normally.
We will use it below like: i < systab->nr_tables, if
systab is wrong, the code will fail to work.
>
>> + /*
>> + * Get EFI tables from systab. Based on efi_config_init() and
>> + * efi_config_parse_tables().
>> + */
>> + size = efi_64 ? sizeof(efi_config_table_64_t) :
>> + sizeof(efi_config_table_32_t);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < systab->nr_tables; i++) {
>> + void *config_tables;
>> + unsigned long table;
>> + efi_guid_t guid;
>> +
>> + config_tables = (void *)(systab->tables + size * i);
>> + if (efi_64) {
>> + efi_config_table_64_t *tmp_table;
>> +
>> + tmp_table = (efi_config_table_64_t *)config_tables;
>
>Since 'config_tables' is a void * there's no need to cast the type.
>
>> + guid = tmp_table->guid;
>> + table = tmp_table->table;
>> +
>> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) && table >> 32) {
>> + debug_putstr("Error getting RSDP address: EFI config table located above 4GB.\n");
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> + } else {
>> + efi_config_table_32_t *tmp_table;
>> +
>> + tmp_table = (efi_config_table_32_t *)config_tables;
>
>Ditto.
>
>> + guid = tmp_table->guid;
>> + table = tmp_table->table;
>> + }
>
>So it looks like
>
>> +
>> + if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_TABLE_GUID)))
>> + rsdp_addr = (acpi_physical_address)table;
>> + else if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID)))
>> + return (acpi_physical_address)table;
>
>'return' is not a function.
Got it, will clean the type cast.
Thanks,
Chao Fan
>
>Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-18 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-14 9:30 [PATCH v14 0/5] x86/boot/KASLR: Parse ACPI table and limit KASLR to choosing immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-12-14 9:30 ` [PATCH v14 1/5] x86/boot: Introduce get_acpi_rsdp() to parse RSDP in cmdline from KEXEC Chao Fan
2018-12-17 17:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-17 18:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-12-17 18:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 1:27 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-18 11:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-19 1:18 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-14 9:30 ` [PATCH v14 2/5] x86/boot: Introduce efi_get_rsdp_addr() to find RSDP from EFI table Chao Fan
2018-12-17 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-17 17:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-25 7:43 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-17 18:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-12-17 18:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 1:45 ` Chao Fan [this message]
2018-12-14 9:30 ` [PATCH v14 3/5] x86/boot: Introduce bios_get_rsdp_addr() to search RSDP in memory Chao Fan
2018-12-17 17:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 2:28 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-14 9:30 ` [PATCH v14 4/5] x86/boot: Parse SRAT address from RSDP and store immovable memory Chao Fan
2018-12-17 17:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 3:17 ` Chao Fan
2018-12-14 9:30 ` [PATCH v14 5/5] x86/boot/KASLR: Limit KASLR to extracting kernel in " Chao Fan
2018-12-17 17:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-18 2:49 ` Chao Fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181218014526.GC31775@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msys.mizuma@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox