From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] printk: increase devkmsg write() ratelimit
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 12:29:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181218112934.GF15430@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181218111701.GA32522@jagdpanzerIV>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 08:17:01PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (12/18/18 11:48), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > I know that there is a "kernel.printk_devkmsg" interface; do we
> > > expect every systemd-enabled distro to find that out and to tweak
> > > kernel.printk_devkmsg or shall we change the default devkmsg
> > > ratelimit instead?
> >
> > How about we complain to systemd instead?
>
> We certainly can. As far as I understand, they log shutdown events
> (including errors and warnings): what they kill, what they stop,
> what they umount, etc. The more partitions, services are running
> (I guess), the more things they need to umount, kill, stop; hence,
> the more messages. I kinda can imagine what they will answer ;)
>
> The below (and a bunch of other) messages are getting ratelimited.
> I'm not sure what will happen should any of those steps fail and
> print warning-s. My guess would be that we probably can ratelimit
> those warnings:
Why are they writing it to /dev/kmsg though? Shouldn't they be writing
this to syslog directly?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-18 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-18 9:18 [RFC][PATCH] printk: increase devkmsg write() ratelimit Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-18 11:17 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-12-18 13:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 11:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-18 13:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 14:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-18 14:55 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 15:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-18 15:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 15:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-18 16:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 17:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-12-18 17:37 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-19 8:50 ` Petr Mladek
2018-12-20 11:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-20 13:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-12-21 7:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 17:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-19 1:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-12-18 14:02 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181218112934.GF15430@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox