public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: kprobes: Show correct blaclkist in debugfs
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 18:24:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181218172134.GA2902@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181218135026.6f96a89247e9b70fa45afbe9@kernel.org>

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:50:26PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
...
> > Side question: there are certain symbols in arch/x86/xen that should be
> > blacklisted explicitly, because they're non-attachable.
> > 
> > More exactly, all functions defined in arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c,
> > arch/x86/xen/time.c and arch/x86/xen/irq.c.
> > 
> > The reason is that these files are compiled without -pg to allow the
> > usage of ftrace within a Xen domain apparently (from
> > arch/x86/xen/Makefile):
> > 
> >  ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> >  # Do not profile debug and lowlevel utilities
> >  CFLAGS_REMOVE_spinlock.o = -pg
> >  CFLAGS_REMOVE_time.o = -pg
> >  CFLAGS_REMOVE_irq.o = -pg
> >  endif
> 
> 
> Actually, the reason why you can not probe those functions via
> tracing/kprobe_events is just a side effect. You can probe it if you
> write a kprobe module. Since the kprobe_events depends on some ftrace
> tracing functions, it sometimes cause a recursive call problem. To avoid
> this issue, I have introduced a CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE, see
> commit 45408c4f9250 ("tracing: kprobes: Prohibit probing on notrace function").
> 
> If you set CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE=n, you can continue putting probes
> on Xen spinlock functions too.

OK.

> 
> > Do you see a nice and clean way to blacklist all these functions
> > (something like arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist()), or should we just
> > flag all of them explicitly with NOKPROBE_SYMBOL()?
> 
> As I pointed, you can probe it via your own kprobe module. Like systemtap,
> you still can probe it. The blacklist is for "kprobes", not for "kprobe_events".
> (Those are used to same, but since the above commit, those are different now)
> 
> I think the most sane solution is, identifying which (combination of) functions
> in ftrace (kernel/trace/*) causes a problem, marking those NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and
> removing CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE.

OK. Thanks for the clarification!

-Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-18 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-17  8:20 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: kprobes: Show correct blaclkist in debugfs Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17  8:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] kprobes: Blacklist symbols in arch-defined prohibited area Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 18:18   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17  8:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/kprobes: Show x86-64 specific blacklisted symbols correctly Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 18:19   ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86: " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17  8:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/kprobes: Remove unneeded arch_within_kprobe_blacklist from x86 Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 18:20   ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86: " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: kprobes: Show correct blaclkist in debugfs Andrea Righi
2018-12-18  4:50   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-18 17:24     ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2018-12-27 17:09       ` Andrea Righi
2019-01-01 13:16         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-01-01 13:37           ` Andrea Righi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181218172134.GA2902@xps-13 \
    --to=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox