From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: KVM Mailing List <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-S390 Mailing List <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>,
Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/15] KVM: s390: unify pending_irqs() and pending_irqs_no_gisa()
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 12:06:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181220120614.65acacac.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181219191756.57973-6-mimu@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 20:17:46 +0100
Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Use a single function with parameter irq_flags to differentiate
> between cases.
>
> New irq flag:
> IRQ_FLAG_LOCAL: include vcpu local interruptions pending
> IRQ_FLAG_FLOATING: include vcpu floating interruptions pending
> IRQ_FLAG_GISA: include GISA interruptions pending in IPM
I presume that means that irqs may be in more than one set? Or are gisa
irqs not considered floating irqs, because they use a different
mechanism?
>
> New irq masks:
> IRQ_MASK_ALL: include all types
> IRQ_MASK_NO_GISA: include all types but GISA
>
> Examples:
> pending_irqs(vcpu, IRQ_MASK_ALL)
> pending_irqs(vcpu, IRQ_MASK_NO_GISA)
>
> There will be more irq flags with upcoming patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index 093b568b6356..4ab20d2eb180 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,13 @@
> #define PFAULT_DONE 0x0680
> #define VIRTIO_PARAM 0x0d00
>
> +#define IRQ_FLAG_LOCAL 0x8000 /* include local interruption pending mask */
> +#define IRQ_FLAG_FLOATING 0x4000 /* include float interruption pending mask */
> +#define IRQ_FLAG_GISA 0x2000 /* include GISA interruption pending mask */
> +
> +#define IRQ_MASK_ALL (IRQ_FLAG_LOCAL | IRQ_FLAG_FLOATING | IRQ_FLAG_GISA)
> +#define IRQ_MASK_NO_GISA (IRQ_MASK_ALL & ~IRQ_FLAG_GISA)
> +
> /* handle external calls via sigp interpretation facility */
> static int sca_ext_call_pending(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int *src_id)
> {
> @@ -237,16 +244,18 @@ static inline int kvm_s390_gisa_tac_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gis
> return test_and_clear_bit_inv(IPM_BIT_OFFSET + gisc, (unsigned long *) gisa);
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long pending_irqs_no_gisa(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +static inline unsigned long pending_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u16 irq_flags)
Any deeper reason why this is a u16? 16 bits should be enough for
everyone? :)
> {
> - return vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int.pending_irqs |
> - vcpu->arch.local_int.pending_irqs;
> -}
> + unsigned long pending_irqs = 0;
>
> -static inline unsigned long pending_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> -{
> - return pending_irqs_no_gisa(vcpu) |
> - kvm_s390_gisa_get_ipm(vcpu->kvm->arch.gisa) << IRQ_PEND_IO_ISC_7;
> + if (irq_flags & IRQ_FLAG_LOCAL)
> + pending_irqs |= vcpu->arch.local_int.pending_irqs;
> + if (irq_flags & IRQ_FLAG_FLOATING)
> + pending_irqs |= vcpu->kvm->arch.float_int.pending_irqs;
> + if (irq_flags & IRQ_FLAG_GISA)
> + pending_irqs |= kvm_s390_gisa_get_ipm(vcpu->kvm->arch.gisa) <<
> + IRQ_PEND_IO_ISC_7;
> + return pending_irqs;
> }
>
> static inline int isc_to_irq_type(unsigned long isc)
> @@ -275,7 +284,7 @@ static unsigned long deliverable_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> unsigned long active_mask;
>
> - active_mask = pending_irqs(vcpu);
> + active_mask = pending_irqs(vcpu, IRQ_MASK_ALL);
> if (!active_mask)
> return 0;
>
> @@ -343,7 +352,7 @@ static void __reset_intercept_indicators(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static void set_intercept_indicators_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - if (!(pending_irqs_no_gisa(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_IO_MASK))
> + if (!(pending_irqs(vcpu, IRQ_MASK_NO_GISA) & IRQ_PEND_IO_MASK))
I/O interrupts are always floating, so you probably could check for
only floating (excluding gisa) irqs here.
> return;
> else if (psw_ioint_disabled(vcpu))
> kvm_s390_set_cpuflags(vcpu, CPUSTAT_IO_INT);Store Data
> @@ -353,7 +362,7 @@ static void set_intercept_indicators_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static void set_intercept_indicators_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - if (!(pending_irqs_no_gisa(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_EXT_MASK))
> + if (!(pending_irqs(vcpu, IRQ_MASK_NO_GISA) & IRQ_PEND_EXT_MASK))
> return;
> if (psw_extint_disabled(vcpu))
> kvm_s390_set_cpuflags(vcpu, CPUSTAT_EXT_INT);
> @@ -363,7 +372,7 @@ static void set_intercept_indicators_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static void set_intercept_indicators_mchk(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - if (!(pending_irqs_no_gisa(vcpu) & IRQ_PEND_MCHK_MASK))
> + if (!(pending_irqs(vcpu, IRQ_MASK_NO_GISA) & IRQ_PEND_MCHK_MASK))
> return;
> if (psw_mchk_disabled(vcpu))
> vcpu->arch.sie_block->ictl |= ICTL_LPSW;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-20 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-19 19:17 [PATCH v5 00/15] KVM: s390: make use of the GIB Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 01/15] KVM: s390: unregister debug feature on failing arch init Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 20:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-20 7:49 ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 7:55 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 02/15] KVM: s390: coding style issue kvm_s390_gisa_init/clear() Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 20:13 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-02 16:50 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 16:16 ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 03/15] KVM: s390: factor out nullify_gisa() Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 04/15] KVM: s390: use pending_irqs_no_gisa() where appropriate Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 20:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-02 16:52 ` Pierre Morel
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 05/15] KVM: s390: unify pending_irqs() and pending_irqs_no_gisa() Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 10:09 ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 11:06 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2018-12-20 11:49 ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 12:15 ` Halil Pasic
2018-12-20 12:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-20 12:33 ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 15:43 ` pierre morel
2018-12-20 16:40 ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 06/15] KVM: s390: remove prefix kvm_s390_gisa_ from static inline functions Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 12:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-12-20 14:37 ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 07/15] s390/cio: add function chsc_sgib() Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 08/15] KVM: s390: add the GIB and its related life-cyle functions Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 12:28 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-03 9:49 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 16:25 ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 09/15] KVM: s390: add kvm reference to struct sie_page2 Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 10/15] KVM: s390: add functions to (un)register GISC with GISA Michael Mueller
2018-12-20 14:32 ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-02 17:29 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-02 18:26 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-04 13:19 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-07 17:38 ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-08 10:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-08 13:07 ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-08 13:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-08 13:36 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-08 13:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-08 14:23 ` Halil Pasic
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 11/15] KVM: s390: restore IAM in get_ipm() when IPM is clean Michael Mueller
2019-01-03 15:06 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 18:17 ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-06 23:32 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-08 8:06 ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 12/15] KVM: s390: do not restore IAM immediately before SIE entry Michael Mueller
2019-01-03 15:00 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 17:53 ` Michael Mueller
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 13/15] KVM: s390: add function process_gib_alert_list() Michael Mueller
2019-01-03 14:43 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 19:18 ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-08 14:27 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-09 11:39 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-07 19:19 ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-08 6:37 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-01-08 12:59 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-08 15:21 ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-08 18:34 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-09 12:14 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-09 13:10 ` Halil Pasic
2019-01-09 14:49 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-09 16:18 ` Halil Pasic
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 14/15] KVM: s390: add and wire function gib_alert_irq_handler() Michael Mueller
2019-01-03 15:16 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-08 10:06 ` Michael Mueller
2019-01-09 12:35 ` Pierre Morel
2018-12-19 19:17 ` [PATCH v5 15/15] KVM: s390: start using the GIB Michael Mueller
2019-01-02 17:45 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-08 9:03 ` Michael Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181220120614.65acacac.cohuck@redhat.com \
--to=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox