From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Don't unmap EFI boot services code/data regions for EFI_OLD_MEMMAP and EFI_MIXED_MODE
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 11:54:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181222105410.GA130780@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181222022234.7573-1-sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
* Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> wrote:
> Commit d5052a7130a6 ("x86/efi: Unmap EFI boot services code/data regions
> from efi_pgd") forgets to take two EFI modes into consideration namely
> EFI_OLD_MEMMAP and EFI_MIXED_MODE.
So the commit sha1 ended up being this one in tip:efi/core:
08cfb38f3ef4: x86/efi: Unmap EFI boot services code/data regions from efi_pgd
> EFI_OLD_MEMMAP is a legacy way of mapping EFI regions into swapper_pg_dir
> using ioremap() and init_memory_mapping(). This feature can be enabled by
> passing "efi=old_map" as kernel command line argument. But,
> efi_unmap_pages() unmaps EFI boot services code/data regions *only* from
> efi_pgd and hence cannot be used for unmapping EFI boot services code/data
> regions from swapper_pg_dir.
>
> Introduce a temporary fix to not unmap EFI boot services code/data regions
> when EFI_OLD_MEMMAP is enabled while working on a real fix.
>
> EFI_MIXED_MODE is another feature where a 64-bit kernel runs on a
> 64-bit platform crippled by a 32-bit firmware. To support EFI_MIXED_MODE,
> all RAM (i.e. namely EFI regions like EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY,
> EFI_LOADER_<CODE/DATA>, EFI_BOOT_SERVICES_<CODE/DATA> and
> EFI_RUNTIME_CODE/DATA regions) is mapped into efi_pgd all the time to
> facilitate EFI runtime calls access it's arguments in 1:1 mode. Hence,
> don't unmap EFI boot services code/data regions when booted in mixed mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Cc: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> index 09e811b9da26..9c34230aaeae 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/quirks.c
> @@ -380,6 +380,22 @@ static void __init efi_unmap_pages(efi_memory_desc_t *md)
> u64 pa = md->phys_addr;
> u64 va = md->virt_addr;
>
> + /*
> + * To Do: Remove this check after adding functionality to unmap EFI boot
> + * services code/data regions from direct mapping area because
> + * "efi=old_map" maps EFI regions in swapper_pg_dir.
> + */
> + if (efi_enabled(EFI_OLD_MEMMAP))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> + * EFI mixed mode has all RAM mapped to access arguments while making
> + * EFI runtime calls, hence don't unmap EFI boot services code/data
> + * regions.
> + */
> + if (!efi_is_native() && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_MIXED))
> + return;
I suppose old_mmap and mixed mode stopped working altogether after the
unmapping changes? What are the symptoms, instant reboots, crasher, or
some more benign behavior like non-working runtime EFI functionality?
If Ard acks this I'll apply it immediately, as these bugs look like
show-stoppers for merging the EFI tree into v4.21.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-22 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-22 2:22 [PATCH] x86/efi: Don't unmap EFI boot services code/data regions for EFI_OLD_MEMMAP and EFI_MIXED_MODE Sai Praneeth Prakhya
2018-12-22 10:54 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-12-22 11:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-24 9:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-28 21:27 ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
[not found] ` <FFF73D592F13FD46B8700F0A279B802F4860813C@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com>
2018-12-25 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-12-22 19:05 ` Prakhya, Sai Praneeth
2018-12-22 21:03 ` [tip:efi/core] " tip-bot for Sai Praneeth Prakhya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181222105410.GA130780@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox