From: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Naveen N . Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: kprobes: Show correct blaclkist in debugfs
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 18:09:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181227170934.GA2057@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181218172134.GA2902@xps-13>
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 06:24:35PM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:50:26PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> ...
> > > Side question: there are certain symbols in arch/x86/xen that should be
> > > blacklisted explicitly, because they're non-attachable.
> > >
> > > More exactly, all functions defined in arch/x86/xen/spinlock.c,
> > > arch/x86/xen/time.c and arch/x86/xen/irq.c.
> > >
> > > The reason is that these files are compiled without -pg to allow the
> > > usage of ftrace within a Xen domain apparently (from
> > > arch/x86/xen/Makefile):
> > >
> > > ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
> > > # Do not profile debug and lowlevel utilities
> > > CFLAGS_REMOVE_spinlock.o = -pg
> > > CFLAGS_REMOVE_time.o = -pg
> > > CFLAGS_REMOVE_irq.o = -pg
> > > endif
> >
> >
> > Actually, the reason why you can not probe those functions via
> > tracing/kprobe_events is just a side effect. You can probe it if you
> > write a kprobe module. Since the kprobe_events depends on some ftrace
> > tracing functions, it sometimes cause a recursive call problem. To avoid
> > this issue, I have introduced a CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE, see
> > commit 45408c4f9250 ("tracing: kprobes: Prohibit probing on notrace function").
> >
> > If you set CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE=n, you can continue putting probes
> > on Xen spinlock functions too.
>
> OK.
>
> >
> > > Do you see a nice and clean way to blacklist all these functions
> > > (something like arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist()), or should we just
> > > flag all of them explicitly with NOKPROBE_SYMBOL()?
> >
> > As I pointed, you can probe it via your own kprobe module. Like systemtap,
> > you still can probe it. The blacklist is for "kprobes", not for "kprobe_events".
> > (Those are used to same, but since the above commit, those are different now)
> >
> > I think the most sane solution is, identifying which (combination of) functions
> > in ftrace (kernel/trace/*) causes a problem, marking those NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and
> > removing CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE.
I'm planning to spend a little bit more time on this and see if I can
identify the problematic ftrace functions and eventually drop
CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE, following the sane solution.
However, in the meantime, with the following patch I've been able to get
a more reliable kprobes blacklist and show also the notrace functions in
debugfs when CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE is off.
It's probably ugly and inefficient, because it's iterating over all
symbols in x86's arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(), but it seems to work
for my specific use case, so I thought it shouldn't be bad to share it,
just in case (maybe someone else is also interested).
Thanks,
From: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: kprobes: automatically blacklist all non-traceable functions
Iterate over all symbols to detect those that are non-traceable and
blacklist them.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <righi.andrea@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 11 +++++++++--
kernel/kprobes.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index 4ba75afba527..8cc7191ba3f9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -1026,10 +1026,17 @@ int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(kprobe_fault_handler);
+static int do_kprobes_arch_blacklist(void *data, const char *name,
+ struct module *mod, unsigned long addr)
+{
+ if (arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(addr))
+ kprobe_add_ksym_blacklist(addr);
+ return 0;
+}
+
int __init arch_populate_kprobe_blacklist(void)
{
- return kprobe_add_area_blacklist((unsigned long)__entry_text_start,
- (unsigned long)__entry_text_end);
+ return kallsyms_on_each_symbol(do_kprobes_arch_blacklist, NULL);
}
int __init arch_init_kprobes(void)
diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
index f4ddfdd2d07e..2e824cd536ba 100644
--- a/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -1389,11 +1389,29 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
return ret;
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_KPROBES_ON_FTRACE) && \
+ !defined(CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS_ON_NOTRACE)
+static bool within_notrace(unsigned long addr)
+{
+ unsigned long offset, size;
+
+ if (!kallsyms_lookup_size_offset(addr, &size, &offset))
+ return true;
+ return !ftrace_location_range(addr - offset, addr - offset + size);
+}
+#else
+static bool within_notrace(unsigned long addr)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+#endif
+
bool __weak arch_within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
{
/* The __kprobes marked functions and entry code must not be probed */
- return addr >= (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_start &&
- addr < (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_end;
+ return (addr >= (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_start &&
+ addr < (unsigned long)__kprobes_text_end) ||
+ within_notrace(addr);
}
bool within_kprobe_blacklist(unsigned long addr)
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-27 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-17 8:20 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: kprobes: Show correct blaclkist in debugfs Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 8:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] kprobes: Blacklist symbols in arch-defined prohibited area Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 18:18 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 8:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/kprobes: Show x86-64 specific blacklisted symbols correctly Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 18:19 ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86: " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 8:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/kprobes: Remove unneeded arch_within_kprobe_blacklist from x86 Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 18:20 ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes/x86: " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-17 15:47 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: kprobes: Show correct blaclkist in debugfs Andrea Righi
2018-12-18 4:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-12-18 17:24 ` Andrea Righi
2018-12-27 17:09 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2019-01-01 13:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-01-01 13:37 ` Andrea Righi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181227170934.GA2057@xps-13 \
--to=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox