public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: <x86@kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] x86_64/mm: remove bottom-up allocation style by pushing forward the parsing of mem hotplug info
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 18:05:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190108100542.GA2216@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1546849485-27933-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 04:24:41PM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
>Background about the defect of the current bottom-up allocation style, take
>the following scenario:
>  |  unmovable node |     movable node                           |
>     | kaslr-kernel |subtree of pgtable for phy<->virt |
>
>Although kaslr-kernel can avoid to stain the movable node. But the
>pgtable can still stain the movable node. That is a probability problem,
>with low probability, but still exist. This patch tries to eliminate the
>probability. With the previous patch, at the point of init_mem_mapping(),
>memblock allocator can work with the knowledge of acpi memory hotmovable
>info, and avoid to stain the movable node. As a result,
>memory_map_bottom_up() is not needed any more.
>

Hi Pingfan,

Tang Chen ever tried to do this before adding 'movable_node':
commit e8d1955258091e4c92d5a975ebd7fd8a98f5d30f
Author: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:   Fri Feb 22 16:33:44 2013 -0800

    acpi, memory-hotplug: parse SRAT before memblock is ready

Then, Lu Yinghai tried to do the similar job, you can see:
https://lwn.net/Articles/554854/
for more information. Hope that can help you.

Thanks,
Chao Fan

>
>Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
>Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
>Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
>Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
>Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
>Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>
>Pingfan Liu (4):
>  acpi: change the topo of acpi_table_upgrade()
>  x86/setup: parse acpi to get hotplug info before init_mem_mapping()
>  x86/mm: set allowed range for memblock allocator
>  x86/mm: remove bottom-up allocation style for x86_64
>
> arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c |   2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c   |  17 ++++-
> arch/x86/mm/init.c        | 154 +++++++---------------------------------------
> arch/x86/mm/init_32.c     | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/mm/mm_internal.h |   7 +++
> drivers/acpi/tables.c     |   4 +-
> include/linux/acpi.h      |   5 +-
> 7 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 140 deletions(-)
>
>-- 
>2.7.4
>
>
>



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-01-08 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-07  8:24 [RFC PATCH 0/4] x86_64/mm: remove bottom-up allocation style by pushing forward the parsing of mem hotplug info Pingfan Liu
2019-01-07  8:24 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] acpi: change the topo of acpi_table_upgrade() Pingfan Liu
2019-01-07 10:55   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-01-07  8:24 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] x86/setup: parse acpi to get hotplug info before init_mem_mapping() Pingfan Liu
2019-01-07 12:52   ` Pingfan Liu
2019-01-07 17:11   ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-08  6:30     ` Pingfan Liu
2019-01-07  8:24 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/mm: set allowed range for memblock allocator Pingfan Liu
2019-01-07  8:24 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] x86/mm: remove bottom-up allocation style for x86_64 Pingfan Liu
2019-01-07 17:42   ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-08  6:13     ` Pingfan Liu
2019-01-08  6:37       ` Juergen Gross
2019-01-08 17:32       ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-09  2:44         ` Pingfan Liu
2019-01-07 17:03 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] x86_64/mm: remove bottom-up allocation style by pushing forward the parsing of mem hotplug info Dave Hansen
2019-01-08  5:49   ` Pingfan Liu
2019-01-08 10:05 ` Chao Fan [this message]
2019-01-08 13:27   ` Pingfan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190108100542.GA2216@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox