From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
johannes.berg@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: [PATCH v6 09/16] locking/lockdep: Reuse list entries that are no longer in use
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:01:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190109210204.192109-10-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109210204.192109-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
Instead of abandoning elements of list_entries[] that are no longer in
use, make alloc_list_entry() reuse array elements that have been freed.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 5b142f699503..5e8a3a17bb94 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#include <linux/hash.h>
#include <linux/ftrace.h>
#include <linux/stringify.h>
+#include <linux/bitmap.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/gfp.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
@@ -132,6 +133,7 @@ static inline int debug_locks_off_graph_unlock(void)
unsigned long nr_list_entries;
static struct lock_list list_entries[MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES];
+static DECLARE_BITMAP(list_entries_in_use, MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES);
/*
* All data structures here are protected by the global debug_lock.
@@ -296,6 +298,7 @@ static struct pending_free {
struct list_head zapped_classes;
struct rcu_head rcu_head;
bool scheduled;
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(list_entries_being_freed, MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES);
} pending_free[2];
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(rcu_cb);
@@ -756,6 +759,19 @@ static bool assign_lock_key(struct lockdep_map *lock)
return true;
}
+static bool list_entry_being_freed(int list_entry_idx)
+{
+ struct pending_free *pf;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0, pf = pending_free; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pending_free);
+ i++, pf++)
+ if (test_bit(list_entry_idx, pf->list_entries_being_freed))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* Initialize the lock_classes[] array elements, the free_lock_classes list
* and also the pending_free[] array.
@@ -896,7 +912,10 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
*/
static struct lock_list *alloc_list_entry(void)
{
- if (nr_list_entries >= MAX_LOCKDEP_ENTRIES) {
+ int idx = find_first_zero_bit(list_entries_in_use,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries));
+
+ if (idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries)) {
if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
return NULL;
@@ -904,7 +923,9 @@ static struct lock_list *alloc_list_entry(void)
dump_stack();
return NULL;
}
- return list_entries + nr_list_entries++;
+ nr_list_entries++;
+ __set_bit(idx, list_entries_in_use);
+ return list_entries + idx;
}
/*
@@ -1008,7 +1029,7 @@ static inline void mark_lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock,
unsigned long nr;
nr = lock - list_entries;
- WARN_ON(nr >= nr_list_entries); /* Out-of-bounds, input fail */
+ WARN_ON(nr >= ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries)); /* Out-of-bounds, input fail */
lock->parent = parent;
lock->class->dep_gen_id = lockdep_dependency_gen_id;
}
@@ -1018,7 +1039,7 @@ static inline unsigned long lock_accessed(struct lock_list *lock)
unsigned long nr;
nr = lock - list_entries;
- WARN_ON(nr >= nr_list_entries); /* Out-of-bounds, input fail */
+ WARN_ON(nr >= ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries)); /* Out-of-bounds, input fail */
return lock->class->dep_gen_id == lockdep_dependency_gen_id;
}
@@ -4277,13 +4298,15 @@ static void zap_class(struct pending_free *pf, struct lock_class *class)
* Remove all dependencies this lock is
* involved in:
*/
- for (i = 0, entry = list_entries; i < nr_list_entries; i++, entry++) {
+ for_each_set_bit(i, list_entries_in_use, ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries)) {
+ entry = list_entries + i;
if (entry->class != class && entry->links_to != class)
continue;
+ if (list_entry_being_freed(i))
+ continue;
+ set_bit(i, pf->list_entries_being_freed);
+ nr_list_entries--;
list_del_rcu(&entry->entry);
- /* Clear .class and .links_to to avoid double removal. */
- WRITE_ONCE(entry->class, NULL);
- WRITE_ONCE(entry->links_to, NULL);
}
if (list_empty(&class->locks_after) &&
list_empty(&class->locks_before)) {
@@ -4325,8 +4348,9 @@ static bool inside_selftest(void)
}
/*
- * Free all lock classes that are on the pf->zapped_classes list. May be called
- * from RCU callback context.
+ * Free all lock classes that are on the pf->zapped_classes list and also all
+ * list entries that have been marked as being freed. May be called from RCU
+ * callback context.
*/
static void free_zapped_classes(struct rcu_head *ch)
{
@@ -4342,6 +4366,9 @@ static void free_zapped_classes(struct rcu_head *ch)
reinit_class(class);
}
list_splice_init(&pf->zapped_classes, &free_lock_classes);
+ bitmap_andnot(list_entries_in_use, list_entries_in_use,
+ pf->list_entries_being_freed, ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries));
+ bitmap_clear(pf->list_entries_being_freed, 0, ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries));
graph_unlock();
restore_irqs:
raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -4626,6 +4653,7 @@ void __init lockdep_init(void)
printk(" memory used by lock dependency info: %zu kB\n",
(sizeof(list_entries) +
+ sizeof(list_entries_in_use) +
sizeof(lock_classes) +
sizeof(classhash_table) +
sizeof(chainhash_table) +
--
2.20.1.97.g81188d93c3-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 21:01 [PATCH v6 00/16] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] locking/lockdep: Fix reported required memory size Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 02/16] locking/lockdep: Avoid that add_chain_cache() adds an invalid chain to the cache Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 03/16] locking/lockdep: Make zap_class() remove all matching lock order entries Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 04/16] locking/lockdep: Reorder struct lock_class members Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 05/16] locking/lockdep: Initialize the locks_before and locks_after lists earlier Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 06/16] locking/lockdep: Split lockdep_free_key_range() and lockdep_reset_lock() Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 07/16] locking/lockdep: Make it easy to detect whether or not inside a selftest Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 08/16] locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] locking/lockdep: Introduce lockdep_next_lockchain() and lock_chain_count() Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] locking/lockdep: Reuse lock chains that have been freed Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:02 ` [PATCH v6 12/16] locking/lockdep: Check data structure consistency Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:02 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] locking/lockdep: Verify whether lock objects are small enough to be used as class keys Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:02 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:02 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys for workqueues Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:02 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] lockdep tests: Test dynamic key registration Bart Van Assche
2019-01-11 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 00/16] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-11 15:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-11 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-11 17:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-14 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-14 16:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-18 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-19 2:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-01 12:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-03 17:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-08 11:43 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-08 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-13 22:32 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190109210204.192109-10-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox