From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, longman@redhat.com,
johannes.berg@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: [PATCH v6 12/16] locking/lockdep: Check data structure consistency
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 13:02:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190109210204.192109-13-bvanassche@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109210204.192109-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
Debugging lockdep data structure inconsistencies is challenging. Add
code that verifies data structure consistency at runtime. That code is
disabled by default because it is very CPU intensive.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 170 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index a8ea03bfc944..acf61dbb8b30 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -74,6 +74,8 @@ module_param(lock_stat, int, 0644);
#define lock_stat 0
#endif
+static bool check_data_structure_consistency;
+
/*
* lockdep_lock: protects the lockdep graph, the hashes and the
* class/list/hash allocators.
@@ -760,6 +762,81 @@ static bool assign_lock_key(struct lockdep_map *lock)
return true;
}
+/* Check whether element @e occurs in list @h */
+static bool in_list(struct list_head *e, struct list_head *h)
+{
+ struct list_head *f;
+
+ list_for_each(f, h) {
+ if (e == f)
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Check whether entry @e occurs in any of the locks_after or locks_before
+ * lists.
+ */
+static bool in_any_class_list(struct list_head *e)
+{
+ struct lock_class *class;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lock_classes); i++) {
+ class = &lock_classes[i];
+ if (in_list(e, &class->locks_after) ||
+ in_list(e, &class->locks_before))
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool class_lock_list_valid(struct lock_class *c, struct list_head *h)
+{
+ struct lock_list *e;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(e, h, entry) {
+ if (e->links_to != c) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "class %s: mismatch for lock entry %ld; class %s <> %s",
+ c->name ? : "(?)",
+ (unsigned long)(e - list_entries),
+ e->links_to && e->links_to->name ?
+ e->links_to->name : "(?)",
+ e->class && e->class->name ? e->class->name :
+ "(?)");
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ return true;
+}
+
+static u16 chain_hlocks[];
+
+static bool check_lock_chain_key(struct lock_chain *chain)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
+ u64 chain_key = 0;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = chain->base; i < chain->base + chain->depth; i++)
+ chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, chain_hlocks[i] + 1);
+ /*
+ * The 'unsigned long long' casts avoid that a compiler warning
+ * is reported when building tools/lib/lockdep.
+ */
+ if (chain->chain_key != chain_key)
+ printk(KERN_INFO "chain %lld: key %#llx <> %#llx\n",
+ (unsigned long long)(chain - lock_chains),
+ (unsigned long long)chain->chain_key,
+ (unsigned long long)chain_key);
+ return chain->chain_key == chain_key;
+#else
+ return true;
+#endif
+}
+
static bool list_entry_being_freed(int list_entry_idx)
{
struct pending_free *pf;
@@ -773,6 +850,97 @@ static bool list_entry_being_freed(int list_entry_idx)
return false;
}
+static bool in_any_zapped_class_list(struct lock_class *class)
+{
+ struct pending_free *pf;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0, pf = pending_free; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pending_free);
+ i++, pf++)
+ if (in_list(&class->lock_entry, &pf->zapped_classes))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool check_data_structures(void)
+{
+ struct lock_class *class;
+ struct lock_chain *chain;
+ struct hlist_head *head;
+ struct lock_list *e;
+ int i;
+
+ /* Check whether all classes occur in a lock list. */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lock_classes); i++) {
+ class = &lock_classes[i];
+ if (!in_list(&class->lock_entry, &all_lock_classes) &&
+ !in_list(&class->lock_entry, &free_lock_classes) &&
+ !in_any_zapped_class_list(class)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "class %px/%s is not in any class list\n",
+ class, class->name ? : "(?)");
+ return false;
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Check whether all classes have valid lock lists. */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lock_classes); i++) {
+ class = &lock_classes[i];
+ if (!class_lock_list_valid(class, &class->locks_before))
+ return false;
+ if (!class_lock_list_valid(class, &class->locks_after))
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ /* Check the chain_key of all lock chains. */
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(chainhash_table); i++) {
+ head = chainhash_table + i;
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(chain, head, entry) {
+ if (!check_lock_chain_key(chain))
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Check whether all list entries that are in use occur in a class
+ * lock list.
+ */
+ for_each_set_bit(i, list_entries_in_use, ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries)) {
+ if (list_entry_being_freed(i))
+ continue;
+ e = list_entries + i;
+ if (!in_any_class_list(&e->entry)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "list entry %d is not in any class list; class %s <> %s\n",
+ (unsigned int)(e - list_entries),
+ e->class->name ? : "(?)",
+ e->links_to->name ? : "(?)");
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Check whether all list entries that are not in use do not occur in
+ * a class lock list.
+ */
+ for_each_clear_bit(i, list_entries_in_use, ARRAY_SIZE(list_entries)) {
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(list_entry_being_freed(i)))
+ return false;
+ e = list_entries + i;
+ if (in_any_class_list(&e->entry)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO "list entry %d occurs in a class list; class %s <> %s\n",
+ (unsigned int)(e - list_entries),
+ e->class && e->class->name ? e->class->name :
+ "(?)",
+ e->links_to && e->links_to->name ?
+ e->links_to->name : "(?)");
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
/*
* Initialize the lock_classes[] array elements, the free_lock_classes list
* and also the pending_free[] array.
@@ -4376,6 +4544,8 @@ static void free_zapped_classes(struct rcu_head *ch)
if (!graph_lock())
goto restore_irqs;
pf->scheduled = false;
+ if (check_data_structure_consistency)
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!check_data_structures());
list_for_each_entry(class, &pf->zapped_classes, lock_entry) {
reinit_class(class);
}
--
2.20.1.97.g81188d93c3-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-09 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 21:01 [PATCH v6 00/16] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 01/16] locking/lockdep: Fix reported required memory size Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 02/16] locking/lockdep: Avoid that add_chain_cache() adds an invalid chain to the cache Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 03/16] locking/lockdep: Make zap_class() remove all matching lock order entries Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 04/16] locking/lockdep: Reorder struct lock_class members Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 05/16] locking/lockdep: Initialize the locks_before and locks_after lists earlier Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 06/16] locking/lockdep: Split lockdep_free_key_range() and lockdep_reset_lock() Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 07/16] locking/lockdep: Make it easy to detect whether or not inside a selftest Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 08/16] locking/lockdep: Free lock classes that are no longer in use Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 09/16] locking/lockdep: Reuse list entries " Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 10/16] locking/lockdep: Introduce lockdep_next_lockchain() and lock_chain_count() Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:01 ` [PATCH v6 11/16] locking/lockdep: Reuse lock chains that have been freed Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:02 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-01-09 21:02 ` [PATCH v6 13/16] locking/lockdep: Verify whether lock objects are small enough to be used as class keys Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:02 ` [PATCH v6 14/16] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:02 ` [PATCH v6 15/16] kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys for workqueues Bart Van Assche
2019-01-09 21:02 ` [PATCH v6 16/16] lockdep tests: Test dynamic key registration Bart Van Assche
2019-01-11 12:48 ` [PATCH v6 00/16] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-11 15:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-11 16:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-11 17:01 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-14 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-14 16:52 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-18 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-19 2:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-01 12:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-02-03 17:36 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-08 11:43 ` Will Deacon
2019-02-08 16:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-02-13 22:32 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190109210204.192109-13-bvanassche@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox