From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>,
Anatol Pomozov <anatol.pomozov@gmail.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: seqcount usage in xt_replace_table()
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 06:50:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190110145029.GL1215@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+ZMcQ3aF+mJws2mzbHww=ZGB9XQkPU5YUsicNS9SKwD_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 01:38:11PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:30 PM Andrea Parri
> <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com> wrote:
> >
> > > For seqcounts we currently simply ignore all accesses within the read
> > > section (thus the requirement to dynamically track read sections).
> > > What does LKMM say about seqlocks?
> >
> > LKMM does not currently model seqlocks, if that's what you're asking;
> > c.f., tools/memory-model/linux-kernel.def for a list of the currently
> > supported synchronization primitives.
> >
> > LKMM has also no notion of "data race", it insists that the code must
> > contain no unmarked accesses; we have been discussing such extensions
> > since at least Dec'17 (we're not quite there!, as mentioned by Paul).
>
> How does it call cases that do contain unmarked accesses then? :)
>
> > My opinion is that ignoring all accesses within a given read section
> > _can_ lead to false negatives
>
> Absolutely. But this is a deliberate decision.
> For our tools we consider priority 1: no false positives. Period.
> Priority 2: also report some true positives in best effort manner.
>
> > (in every possible definition of "data
> > race" and "read sections" I can think of at the moment ;D):
> >
> > P0 P1
> > read_seqbegin() x = 1;
> > r0 = x;
> > read_seqretry() // =0
> >
> > ought to be "racy"..., right? (I didn't audit all the callsites for
> > read_{seqbegin,seqretry}(), but I wouldn't be surprised to find such
> > pattern ;D ... "legacy", as you recalled).
One approach would be to forgive data races in the seqlock read-side
critical section only if:
o There was a later matching read_seqretry() that returned true, and
o There were no dereferences of any data-racy load. (Yeah, this
one should be good clean fun to model!)
Do people nest read_seqbegin(), and if so, what does that mean? ;-)
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-10 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-08 19:33 seqcount usage in xt_replace_table() Anatol Pomozov
2019-01-08 22:37 ` Florian Westphal
2019-01-10 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 12:53 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-10 20:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 14:48 ` Florian Westphal
2019-01-10 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 20:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 22:29 ` Florian Westphal
2019-01-11 8:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-11 14:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 14:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-09 0:02 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-09 0:36 ` Anatol Pomozov
2019-01-09 5:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-09 11:24 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-09 11:55 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-09 12:11 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-09 12:29 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-09 17:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-01-10 8:49 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-10 12:30 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-10 12:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-10 12:46 ` Andrea Parri
2019-01-10 13:25 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-01-10 14:50 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2019-01-10 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-01-10 12:54 ` Dmitry Vyukov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190110145029.GL1215@linux.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=anatol.pomozov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).