From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB6CC43387 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:05:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2AD20879 for ; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 11:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="RXPdm33/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726598AbfAMLFw (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jan 2019 06:05:52 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:57134 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725875AbfAMLFw (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jan 2019 06:05:52 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2BE0800095916A4033B04A37.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2be0:8000:9591:6a40:33b0:4a37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 346201EC0432; Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:05:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1547377551; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=tql07rLHgnOWyn82gmEMn6j7EF9cKvRN3YgsvX0EJA0=; b=RXPdm33/N6o64PJg5ebadwwGaW1wgc0BB4OetwSvW6TKpmbAz80j+b6/e3f0Mq5v5haAHu FPuIKZ4/e12/kuFuMJyxEc4UDVjD9ZoOw6yqYInFH4sTqNba/fa6wvZ5wamHVvTMSoMMO0 d9yQpyR8hc7GDmmfk2WANxXEOneGES0= Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2019 12:05:45 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Chao Fan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, keescook@chromium.org, bhe@redhat.com, msys.mizuma@gmail.com, indou.takao@jp.fujitsu.com, caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 3/6] x86/boot: Introduce efi_get_rsdp_addr() to find RSDP from EFI table Message-ID: <20190113110544.GA7398@zn.tnic> References: <20190107032243.25324-1-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190107032243.25324-4-fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190110211523.GG17621@zn.tnic> <20190111012353.GD2216@localhost.localdomain> <20190111103225.GA4729@zn.tnic> <20190113094704.GC13263@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190113094704.GC13263@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 05:47:04PM +0800, Chao Fan wrote: > 'acpi_physical_address' could be define as u64 or u32. And when can acpi_physical_address be a u32? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.