From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D7CC43387 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864F020659 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:03:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547506997; bh=79rJVvsdJaQH9A+XEpnjKMywDGi6n3NYiAlafk8jdhw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=rUPmnBlqOFq53Q04yW6EN6CI9+Pg9WwlVW2E3WdjQ+WCruO31ukwBGVjrk8iZAueW d+NzEnyQX8jFg69xWVt1bQSRvmaT8cQerWa4eo/P2AadKjum9yDbidBSkwrCliSrlj S1RctVYoE0jtH26ohkhwI8NDINqNM/8mxnoZZddA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727163AbfANXDP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 18:03:15 -0500 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:38396 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726747AbfANXDP (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jan 2019 18:03:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=W2d/sJksifvu3BVio+1/SWMT7I5lc8/k42xZEYFmUo0=; b=bZ/yT2Cs5S2IX38XzyjoAiCh8 UzHjdL1UYUii9UxxASIFaNTBxgCmKnD1/DDzmMuB/jD76Z/P9xbTGNAt8wgKX6fl27f3sh93r2gGA f3/68Xl8KuVz+KMuToPhmb87yLbyV2k55mkTRXuJdjls9vxmT4uPIDJUW3Hj2uXuVWMDo=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=debutante.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gjBG0-0000SF-JB; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:03:00 +0000 Received: by debutante.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1FC911127AD1; Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:02:55 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:02:55 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Jon Hunter Cc: Kuninori Morimoto , Liam Girdwood , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Matthias Reichl , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Marcel Ziswiler , Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marcel Ziswiler Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v1 3/3] ASoC: soc-core: fix platform name vs. of_node assignement Message-ID: <20190114230255.GK11073@sirena.org.uk> References: <0660a471-3698-2059-4494-ad146518a4ed@nvidia.com> <20190109125340.GD10405@sirena.org.uk> <52f5f2cf-9260-f9c5-f73d-3c3d5debc86b@nvidia.com> <20190109141439.GE10405@sirena.org.uk> <875zuxb9uy.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <871s5kqb43.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87h8efpoxh.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SCOJXUq1iwCn05li" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: From concentrate. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --SCOJXUq1iwCn05li Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 09:15:42AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > On 11/01/2019 08:51, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > > So, can you agree about these ? > > 1) Add enough information/documentation about legacy/modern style and its plan. > > 2) Add dirty pointer fixup patch as workaround > > 3) switch to modern style as much as possible > I think that Mark needs to decided on whether use your 'dirty pointer' > fix or not. I've gone ahead with Curtis' version of Morimoto-san's patch just now - hopefully that's fine for v5.0. Like we've been saying neither approach is ideal, thanks Jon and Morimoto-san for your efforts analyzing this and your proposals. --SCOJXUq1iwCn05li Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlw9FR4ACgkQJNaLcl1U h9Dbawf/agRz5TjSTBnTWu+KSjrCB+C+lMhRKOffsiss0cyfbgpS+mKvdujG+ZPb 4ebTzIDaG+LZWS83jkfh9wcIWy7miQrcZ7DY5XwoFaiLp4fbkVA5lW5jId2juf4u RTy1Q2RR3WR3LxQ0RTP86a+4L9Gf3jaQm3n2NIw0k9TqKgMB89q1inAMkTNn8F0U AozHjzvy1o1P57iHFj+BTeAmfAlpqzfJ2wsadm8dyxauitp5Pa9JWepq+BZJX0g9 rw3OrFs2VKrpj6FfcVTaeyHgMSITOqcd19B+CoJoYBKP20+ogs58j71e0ndqALxw DH40p4DyPx1zi98Q5cyo6gMiJI2xAg== =JWgH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SCOJXUq1iwCn05li--