From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD3AC43387 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D145D20645 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:54:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547571254; bh=E1TsEWYztLW1G2QPVBwN7Dt8mokTtTfmFOAN6Q4OETk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=G4jYdQwREvoyWmjVhQog955wheeHIWOqBD9nYobQwQyf2hnNi/RYeb5UNdkAKW1Iu H2DVftt2E06U/sleN6TWGYQnvSRB24pux6H0QUU05xN0revDzvaICokiuZonFjbl1q VmGpoD16+rOZENHFHZbyV4nI3heRx8kgzJ/yrCi0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733193AbfAOQnP (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:43:15 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60826 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733163AbfAOQnL (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:43:11 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBDAE2054F; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:43:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547570591; bh=E1TsEWYztLW1G2QPVBwN7Dt8mokTtTfmFOAN6Q4OETk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=nkJEUrTTwuspIxYKVsWZAp8djSKgGnWua4/eDD0cw/zf2s/BzyKKnurm4RETzuLJT 8ixtnZtN//DA8RGfUoIKzehgJ5RVmMKULey1KO4sW2VrMimrWo52HP4GIRskKJsXkC hKSAn0o0YOA1kHYiUythaKVR34mCEq7tll6V4NOE= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Ilya Dryomov , Dongsheng Yang Subject: [PATCH 4.19 37/50] rbd: dont return 0 on unmap if RBD_DEV_FLAG_REMOVING is set Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 17:36:13 +0100 Message-Id: <20190115154912.043566009@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190115154909.933241945@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190115154909.933241945@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Ilya Dryomov commit 85f5a4d666fd9be73856ed16bb36c5af5b406b29 upstream. There is a window between when RBD_DEV_FLAG_REMOVING is set and when the device is removed from rbd_dev_list. During this window, we set "already" and return 0. Returning 0 from write(2) can confuse userspace tools because 0 indicates that nothing was written. In particular, "rbd unmap" will retry the write multiple times a second: 10:28:05.463299 write(4, "0", 1) = 0 10:28:05.463509 write(4, "0", 1) = 0 10:28:05.463720 write(4, "0", 1) = 0 10:28:05.463942 write(4, "0", 1) = 0 10:28:05.464155 write(4, "0", 1) = 0 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov Tested-by: Dongsheng Yang Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/block/rbd.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/block/rbd.c +++ b/drivers/block/rbd.c @@ -5982,7 +5982,6 @@ static ssize_t do_rbd_remove(struct bus_ struct list_head *tmp; int dev_id; char opt_buf[6]; - bool already = false; bool force = false; int ret; @@ -6015,13 +6014,13 @@ static ssize_t do_rbd_remove(struct bus_ spin_lock_irq(&rbd_dev->lock); if (rbd_dev->open_count && !force) ret = -EBUSY; - else - already = test_and_set_bit(RBD_DEV_FLAG_REMOVING, - &rbd_dev->flags); + else if (test_and_set_bit(RBD_DEV_FLAG_REMOVING, + &rbd_dev->flags)) + ret = -EINPROGRESS; spin_unlock_irq(&rbd_dev->lock); } spin_unlock(&rbd_dev_list_lock); - if (ret < 0 || already) + if (ret) return ret; if (force) {