From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B729BC43387 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 02:21:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8757E20866 for ; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 02:21:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547605288; bh=ovWCjT45h4WTfSnSYYNC56vKpypy8+XVsA6zwQ+eda4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=1gLoQTO2CXuFhduW6u4QCrTX2nSaN+ZMvFn/EbcO3pPWy2FZ/NSq7USKf2suXXq2C kMSPFKJ678LOn2kYN2aq3Hqr6qj5K7DL6MvsDBI3pGiums6ym3By4reNb4GDe9tPKL ajeP7izqDjcFLB3of0L6gVsU9ziRmouuvTGwxS5k= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728394AbfAPCV1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 21:21:27 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48364 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727933AbfAPCV0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 21:21:26 -0500 Received: from dragon (61-216-91-114.HINET-IP.hinet.net [61.216.91.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C17920651; Wed, 16 Jan 2019 02:21:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1547605286; bh=ovWCjT45h4WTfSnSYYNC56vKpypy8+XVsA6zwQ+eda4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=KoIIa8uoKVz6lNzs6WW3eIWhTgNLCaI9bUc/dwCEJ2A30bnDhc80AkWweYRrZ1si5 JPobZQ6rM7rJVe2SdyM6nUUwOcX58OqzOqcMG2SJ7Ehr1sz2K3Ewe7ZaLKnOTAHXxg z5m+T7cE6AwZ10SmJzZ9UIpmo9vlorVYwU7USeaU= Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 10:21:01 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: Rob Herring Cc: Manivannan Sadhasivam , Yang-Leo Li , "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , a.tropschug@ebs-systart.com, m.bittner@ebs-systart.com, Amit Kucheria Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add devicetree binding for Oxalis Message-ID: <20190116022100.GC15808@dragon> References: <20190114102053.16013-1-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> <20190114102053.16013-3-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:02:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:21 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam > wrote: > > > > Add devicetree binding for Oxalis board in JSON format. While adding > > that, let's fix the description for LS1012A also. > > > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > index d34fe0749199..0f30142fe316 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > @@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ properties: > > - fsl,vf610 > > - fsl,vf610m4 > > > > - - description: LS1021A based Boards > > + - description: LS1012A based Boards > > Well, yes that was wrong... > > > items: > > - enum: > > - fsl,ls1012a-rdb > > - fsl,ls1012a-frdm > > - fsl,ls1012a-qds > > + - ebs-systart,oxalis > > Sort alphabetically. > > > - const: fsl,ls1021a > > And this is wrong too. > > I you just change it, then we will be missing an entry for LS1021A. > What's the status of that SoC because there is no board dts file? We > should not have .dtsi files in the kernel which don't get built. Hmm, I do not see any LS1021A SoC .dtsi in the tree. I suspect it's just a typo of LS1012A. @Leo, do we have a LS1021A SoC? Shawn