From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Ching Huang <ching2048@areca.com.tw>
Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com,
James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
hch@infradead.org, colin.king@canonical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] scsi: arcmsr: Fix suspend/resume of ACB_ADAPTER_TYPE_B part 2
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:59:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190117070227.GM4504@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1547696703.4339.21.camel@Centos6.3-64>
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 11:45:03AM +0800, Ching Huang wrote:
> >From Ching Huang <ching2048@areca.com.tw>
>
> Fix suspend/resume of ACB_ADAPTER_TYPE_B part 2.
>
What does this look like from a user perspective? Does it fail every
time or does it only fail sometimes?
What's the bug exactly?
There is no Fixes tag...
> Signed-off-by: Ching Huang <ching2048@areca.com.tw>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.h b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.h
> index a94c513..b98c632 100755
> --- a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr.h
> @@ -508,9 +508,9 @@ struct MessageUnit_A
> struct MessageUnit_B
> {
> uint32_t post_qbuffer[ARCMSR_MAX_HBB_POSTQUEUE];
> - uint32_t done_qbuffer[ARCMSR_MAX_HBB_POSTQUEUE];
> + volatile uint32_t done_qbuffer[ARCMSR_MAX_HBB_POSTQUEUE];
There is a well known rule of thumb that when someone uses "volatile"
in the kernel it means there is a locking problem... Is this __iomem or
something?
> uint32_t postq_index;
> - uint32_t doneq_index;
> + volatile uint32_t doneq_index;
> uint32_t __iomem *drv2iop_doorbell;
> uint32_t __iomem *drv2iop_doorbell_mask;
> uint32_t __iomem *iop2drv_doorbell;
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c
> index 5736434..88053b1 100755
> --- a/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/arcmsr/arcmsr_hba.c
> @@ -1113,7 +1113,11 @@ static int arcmsr_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> switch (acb->adapter_type) {
> case ACB_ADAPTER_TYPE_B: {
> struct MessageUnit_B *reg = acb->pmuB;
> - reg->post_qbuffer[0] = 0;
> + uint32_t i;
> + for (i = 0; i < ARCMSR_MAX_HBB_POSTQUEUE; i++) {
> + reg->post_qbuffer[i] = 0;
> + reg->done_qbuffer[i] = 0;
> + }
Is this cause by patch 1 changing the zalloc to regular alloc?? If so
then it should be folded into that patch instead of sent separately.
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-17 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-17 3:45 [PATCH 2/3] scsi: arcmsr: Fix suspend/resume of ACB_ADAPTER_TYPE_B part 2 Ching Huang
2019-01-17 7:59 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2019-01-17 8:47 ` Ching Huang
2019-01-17 9:16 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-17 9:52 ` Ching Huang
2019-01-22 7:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-01-22 0:03 ` Ching Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190117070227.GM4504@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=ching2048@areca.com.tw \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox