From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F08C43387 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254B620657 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 09:18:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ffwll.ch header.i=@ffwll.ch header.b="OiUzYzh4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728087AbfAQJSY (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 04:18:24 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f66.google.com ([209.85.208.66]:44899 "EHLO mail-ed1-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726732AbfAQJSV (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 04:18:21 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f66.google.com with SMTP id y56so7721911edd.11 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:18:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TbC5ugNB2Sa8RrbjnuWFYz8/+NGYQmf7yxC+1mkduYw=; b=OiUzYzh4KtdcJHhwyHqCsPuU14uYxYI2ae2Egzt4X/MlVIq9FozYWNzfq/AMO7VrBt hy7r/FZrBWSa9inP4hwg/FKRehAbfgNQ8GIb+pX7EGmdKnb42jYszZf14FMg4foShpsU 0NAwJpIMxKiwd3pwwDkyLSJmTRmeweARVXjDc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TbC5ugNB2Sa8RrbjnuWFYz8/+NGYQmf7yxC+1mkduYw=; b=W8celwYa/swgevwZuxfWL2INqqqkA8q0E6basfGrWWvewCKV0TVB4sHXA+dh+50V2B cfAz/R68zgqRpZV0L4F3wbuZQ3M5QKAkF0WPH1VgZbc8kuts9wJ7JmBn7mxOQj6JN1GK 38SbQrHrkEdmivuqCXfCc5heoyDZqeJCa4JA8l0XXMX1P8e3H6LnS2XbIRflfvfrGSGa /tgfq4n8y8kbBwO6Dm/tGFx4oxCBjmsClBK+3wLEXzuxDIIUIawPdHP8Y97WxtiG7Cl+ qLV73dTWA718vcTLGWcsTEUJDET/G1b8oiLeYvaupu6u46hDslFEtLEnIYO8OW7+mdHv xyeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdH52Ia03//T/qtscKtvxn9kR7CRjTQoJva9pdb68AjALey/FvZ G0oOTgN/K6oFiLvqsXluIOQLXA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6Sxej+TEXoD9E65eEug4T1DZrGXrM+q3A4qh6DaL+YSlSq63EpyRmy5C0+AvGHnHvGLdvZqw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:121a:: with SMTP id c26mr10635290edw.104.1547716699507; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:18:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from phenom.ffwll.local ([2a02:168:569e:0:3106:d637:d723:e855]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p22-v6sm3372586ejb.76.2019.01.17.01.18.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 01:18:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 10:13:08 +0100 From: Daniel Vetter To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Sumit Semwal , LKML , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: Fix kerneldoc comment for struct dma_fence_array Message-ID: <20190117091308.GA3271@phenom.ffwll.local> Mail-Followup-To: Jonathan Corbet , Sumit Semwal , LKML , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20190116153436.3b244cda@lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190116153436.3b244cda@lwn.net> X-Operating-System: Linux phenom 4.19.0-1-amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 03:34:36PM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > The kerneldoc comment for struct dma_fence_array lacks a description > of the "work" member, leading to this docs-build warning: > > ./include/linux/dma-fence-array.h:54: warning: Function parameter or member 'work' not described in 'dma_fence_array' > > Add a description and make the warning go away. > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet Applied for 5.1, thanks for your patch. -Daniel > --- > Hopefully I've sent this to the right place; perhaps this file needs to be > added to the MAINTAINERS entry? > > include/linux/dma-fence-array.h | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h b/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h > index bc8940ca280d..c0ff417b4770 100644 > --- a/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h > +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-array.h > @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct dma_fence_array_cb { > * @num_fences: number of fences in the array > * @num_pending: fences in the array still pending > * @fences: array of the fences > + * @work: internal irq_work function > */ > struct dma_fence_array { > struct dma_fence base; > -- > 2.20.1 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch