From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2150EC43387 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A5620859 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729516AbfAQUTa (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:19:30 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:54160 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729150AbfAQUT3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:19:29 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098394.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x0HKItIk012652 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:19:28 -0500 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2q305b94rn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 15:19:28 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:26 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:22 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x0HKJMmP60424336 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:22 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC2311C050; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A04E11C04A; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.145.18.25]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Jan 2019 20:19:21 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 21:19:20 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-s390 , Martin Schwidefsky , Linux Kernel Mailing List , y2038 Mailman List , Dominik Brodowski , Mark Rutland Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] s390: rework compat wrapper generation References: <20190116131527.2071570-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190117133619.GD18351@osiris> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19011720-0008-0000-0000-000002B278C5 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19011720-0009-0000-0000-0000221E9787 Message-Id: <20190117201920.GB3687@osiris> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-01-17_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=958 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1901170141 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 05:21:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:36 PM Heiko Carstens > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 02:15:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > I did not test the changes at runtime, but I looked at the > > > generated object code, which seems fine here and includes > > > the same conversions as before. > > > > All looks good and seems to work fine. This is a very nice > > simplification of our compat code, even if it adds some dead code to > > the kernel image. > > > > I did some tests and it all looks good. Also the generated code looks > > fine. So, if nothing breaks, this will go upstream with next merge > > window via the s390 tree. > > > > Thanks again for your work! > > Awesome, thanks for testing it so quickly and agreeing to merge it! > > There is a dependency that I now have for my y2038 syscall series > of course, so I'd need to have those patches on top of the s390 series. > > I think we can either have a shared git branch that gets merged both > into your s390 tree and my y2038 tree, or we merge it only through > my tree, with your Ack. > > Does that work for you? I'll discuss this with Martin tomorrow, however I think a shared git branch would be the best solution. I want to get as much testing as possible for this patch set, which means this must also be in the s390 tree.