public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
Cc: jslaby@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gkohli@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v3] tty: fix race between flush_to_ldisc and tty_open
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:04:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190118090419.GA1784@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1547801764-13660-1-git-send-email-lirongqing@baidu.com>

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 04:56:04PM +0800, Li RongQing wrote:
> There still is a race window after the commit b027e2298bd588
> ("tty: fix data race between tty_init_dev and flush of buf"),
> and we encountered this crash issue if receive_buf call comes
> before tty initialization completes in n_tty_open and
> tty->driver_data may be NULL.
> 
> CPU0                                    CPU1
> ----                                    ----
>                                  n_tty_open
>                                    tty_init_dev
>                                      tty_ldisc_unlock
>                                        schedule
> flush_to_ldisc
>  receive_buf
>   tty_port_default_receive_buf
>    tty_ldisc_receive_buf
>     n_tty_receive_buf_common
>       __receive_buf
>        uart_flush_chars
>         uart_start
>         /*tty->driver_data is NULL*/
>                                    tty->ops->open
>                                    /*init tty->driver_data*/
> 
> it can be fixed by extending ldisc semaphore lock in tty_init_dev
> to driver_data initialized completely after tty->ops->open(), but
> this will lead to put lock on one function and unlock in some other
> function, and hard to maintain, so fix this race only by checking
> tty->driver_data when receiving, and return if tty->driver_data
> is NULL
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Li <wangli39@baidu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yu <zhangyu31@baidu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/tty_port.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

What changed in this version, from the other versions?  That is always
to be listed below the --- line, as the documentation states.

Please fix up and do a v4 with all of this information.

thanks,

greg k-h

      reply	other threads:[~2019-01-18  9:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-18  8:56 [PATCH][v3] tty: fix race between flush_to_ldisc and tty_open Li RongQing
2019-01-18  9:04 ` Greg KH [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190118090419.GA1784@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox