From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FF8C282DB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F9420823 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729410AbfAUIAS (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:00:18 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35666 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728500AbfAUIAS (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:00:18 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F07750DA; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from xz-x1.nay.redhat.com (dhcp-14-116.nay.redhat.com [10.66.14.116]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FE4608C7; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:00:10 +0000 (UTC) From: Peter Xu To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Hugh Dickins , Maya Gokhale , Jerome Glisse , Johannes Weiner , peterx@redhat.com, Martin Cracauer , Denis Plotnikov , Shaohua Li , Andrea Arcangeli , Pavel Emelyanov , Mike Kravetz , Marty McFadden , Mike Rapoport , Mel Gorman , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" Subject: [PATCH RFC 21/24] khugepaged: skip collapse if uffd-wp detected Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:57:19 +0800 Message-Id: <20190121075722.7945-22-peterx@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20190121075722.7945-1-peterx@redhat.com> References: <20190121075722.7945-1-peterx@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Don't collapse the huge PMD if there is any userfault write protected small PTEs. The problem is that the write protection is in small page granularity and there's no way to keep all these write protection information if the small pages are going to be merged into a huge PMD. The same thing needs to be considered for swap entries and migration entries. So do the check as well disregarding khugepaged_max_ptes_swap. Signed-off-by: Peter Xu --- include/trace/events/huge_memory.h | 1 + mm/khugepaged.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h b/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h index dd4db334bd63..2d7bad9cb976 100644 --- a/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h +++ b/include/trace/events/huge_memory.h @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ EM( SCAN_PMD_NULL, "pmd_null") \ EM( SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE, "exceed_none_pte") \ EM( SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT, "pte_non_present") \ + EM( SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP, "pte_uffd_wp") \ EM( SCAN_PAGE_RO, "no_writable_page") \ EM( SCAN_LACK_REFERENCED_PAGE, "lack_referenced_page") \ EM( SCAN_PAGE_NULL, "page_null") \ diff --git a/mm/khugepaged.c b/mm/khugepaged.c index 8e2ff195ecb3..92f06e1c941e 100644 --- a/mm/khugepaged.c +++ b/mm/khugepaged.c @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ enum scan_result { SCAN_PMD_NULL, SCAN_EXCEED_NONE_PTE, SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT, + SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP, SCAN_PAGE_RO, SCAN_LACK_REFERENCED_PAGE, SCAN_PAGE_NULL, @@ -1125,6 +1126,15 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t pteval = *_pte; if (is_swap_pte(pteval)) { if (++unmapped <= khugepaged_max_ptes_swap) { + /* + * Always be strict with uffd-wp + * enabled swap entries. Please see + * comment below for pte_uffd_wp(). + */ + if (pte_swp_uffd_wp(pteval)) { + result = SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP; + goto out_unmap; + } continue; } else { result = SCAN_EXCEED_SWAP_PTE; @@ -1144,6 +1154,19 @@ static int khugepaged_scan_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, result = SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT; goto out_unmap; } + if (pte_uffd_wp(pteval)) { + /* + * Don't collapse the page if any of the small + * PTEs are armed with uffd write protection. + * Here we can also mark the new huge pmd as + * write protected if any of the small ones is + * marked but that could bring uknown + * userfault messages that falls outside of + * the registered range. So, just be simple. + */ + result = SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP; + goto out_unmap; + } if (pte_write(pteval)) writable = true; -- 2.17.1