From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3B4C282C0 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:00:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775B82184C for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:00:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548259231; bh=WNcPrA8d4jp+LjCXSOnL++hrAaDRb8mCvTrVbMBtK+o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=awWQgfldYWTkpUY79uq1G/P+gDzIC81TTR3MSFlxdkaZoFmb1X9QrAQXXTeKxa/3/ 51/3WLd87/Z6e010gZ/8cgXNnDZvol//T+wDsqAo4a+XAFUM0Rchu0/engVQm//Hyy q9PCawRdJCuxjxl+bGbrkyQqcYJlI9kpFpCTjpDw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727335AbfAWQAY (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:00:24 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43966 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726035AbfAWQAW (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:00:22 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4D2620449; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:00:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548259222; bh=WNcPrA8d4jp+LjCXSOnL++hrAaDRb8mCvTrVbMBtK+o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Hrz3/yTNePN5XCeC9Fq9b7lfDY1s11Qbiu2p8JRgekZW5lZ9smwKqAE88CDD0saNH OzsX4jZYVNnYE+Tm6OeEmSFYmgawzQEz6W4elNtvITtLutVRQniXW/3+U5pn/s6AqH wb994eRuK6hRfNp4MXOzLj/luzliZyDP9N0Rfj5A= Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:00:19 +0100 From: Greg KH To: richard.gong@linux.intel.com Cc: atull@kernel.org, dinguyen@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, todd.riffel@intel.com, Richard Gong Subject: Re: [PATCHv1] firmware: intel_stratix10_service: add hardware dependency Message-ID: <20190123160019.GB4764@kroah.com> References: <1548258476-16821-1-git-send-email-richard.gong@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1548258476-16821-1-git-send-email-richard.gong@linux.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.2 (2019-01-07) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 09:47:56AM -0600, richard.gong@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Richard Gong > > Add a Kconfig dependency to ensure Intel Stratix10 service layer driver > can be built only on the platform that supports it. > > Signed-off-by: Richard Gong > --- > drivers/firmware/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig > index f754578..cac16c4 100644 > --- a/drivers/firmware/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/firmware/Kconfig > @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ config FW_CFG_SYSFS_CMDLINE > > config INTEL_STRATIX10_SERVICE > tristate "Intel Stratix10 Service Layer" > - depends on HAVE_ARM_SMCCC > + depends on ARCH_STRATIX10 && HAVE_ARM_SMCCC That's lame, what about building for testing? And is this needed now, for 5.0-final, or can it wait for 5.1? What changed to require this? tahnks, greg k-h