From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: justinpopo6@gmail.com
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de, lars@metafoo.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: adc: ti-ads7950: inconsistency with spi msg
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:30:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190126183011.00f03cc3@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1548440422-27943-1-git-send-email-justinpopo6@gmail.com>
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:20:22 -0800
justinpopo6@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Justin Chen <justinpopo6@gmail.com>
>
> To read a channel we require 3 cycles to send, process, and receive
> the data. The transfer buffer for the third transaction is left blank.
> This leaves it up to the SPI driver to decide what to do.
Interesting. I think that means you may have a bug in your SPI driver.
The pointer in question is always left set to NULL in the adc
driver (not explicitly but it will be because ultimately comes from
a kzalloc).
Documentation for an SPI message makes it clear that NULL is
allowed. From include/linux/spi/spi.h
"* Those segments always read the same number of bits as they
* write; but one or the other is easily ignored by passing a null buffer
* pointer. "
Hmm. It does say 'ignored'. My assumption has always been that
means it would be filled with zeros, but maybe I'm wrong.
Mark?
>
> In one particular case, if the tx buffer is not set the spi driver
> sets it to 0xff. This puts the ADC in a alarm programming state,
> therefore the following read to a channel becomes erroneous.
>
> Instead of leaving us to the mercy of the SPI driver, we send the
> ADC cmd on the third transaction to prevent inconsistent behavior.
>
> Fixes: 902c4b2446d4 ("iio: adc: New driver for TI ADS7950 chips")
> Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <justinpopo6@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c
> index 0ad6359..1255d8b 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads7950.c
> @@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ static int ti_ads7950_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> st->scan_single_xfer[1].tx_buf = &st->single_tx;
> st->scan_single_xfer[1].len = 2;
> st->scan_single_xfer[1].cs_change = 1;
> + st->scan_single_xfer[2].tx_buf = &st->single_tx;
> st->scan_single_xfer[2].rx_buf = &st->single_rx;
> st->scan_single_xfer[2].len = 2;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-26 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-25 18:20 [PATCH v2] iio: adc: ti-ads7950: inconsistency with spi msg justinpopo6
2019-01-25 18:38 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-01-26 18:30 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2019-01-31 5:15 ` Justin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190126183011.00f03cc3@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=justinpopo6@gmail.com \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox