From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E167C282C8 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:30:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E701420855 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 18:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="Ii8GZ55i" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727290AbfA1SaI (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:30:08 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:45100 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726744AbfA1SaH (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2019 13:30:07 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2BC5DE008821062B415D2F41.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bc5:de00:8821:62b:415d:2f41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 57FB51EC0229; Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:30:06 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1548700206; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=6SEky2RgSR6uf7Veux5Hjwby9f/IiMPdt9mt9hGx9Hg=; b=Ii8GZ55iHUcKPxkS/4bPezcl7aIUu2N6xwIgO3jJ/sJXBT9zok/c0fTNP83Cqoi7Zpkx8m uBvQdOW+UwN5KCFhWzOXMlg+nvRF1v7KgawZBHmgk3tgi1G6+A3eMhh83f7lrq38cziYN1 hgprGFuYM/OKkhzk47Icv6sLWWQ9vtA= Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 19:30:04 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Paolo Bonzini , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Rik van Riel , Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/22] x86/fpu: Make __raw_xsave_addr() use feature number instead of mask Message-ID: <20190128183004.GH20487@zn.tnic> References: <20190109114744.10936-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20190109114744.10936-11-bigeasy@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190109114744.10936-11-bigeasy@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:47:32PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Most users of __raw_xsave_addr() use a feature number, shift it to a > mask and then __raw_xsave_addr() shifts it back to the feature number. > > Make __raw_xsave_addr() use the feature number as an argument. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > --- > arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.