Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/dp_mst: Fix unbalanced malloc ref in drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi()

Daniel Vetter
2019-01-29T20:36:30Z

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 01:39:25PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> In drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(), we currently unconditionally call
> drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc() on the port that's passed to us, even if we
> never successfully allocated VCPI to it. This is contrary to what we do
> in drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi(), where we only call
> drm_dp_mst_get_port_malloc() on the passed port if we successfully
> allocated VCPI to it.
>
> As a result, if drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi() fails during a modeset and
> another successive modeset calls drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi() we will
> end up dropping someone else's malloc reference to the port. Example:
>
> [ 962.309260] ==================================================================
> [ 962.309290] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc+0x72/0x180 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.309296] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888416c30004 by task kworker/0:1H/500
>
> [ 962.309308] CPU: 0 PID: 500 Comm: kworker/0:1H Tainted: G W O 5.0.0-rc2Lyude-Test+ #1
> [ 962.309313] Hardware name: LENOVO 20L8S2N800/20L8S2N800, BIOS N22ET35W (1.12 ) 04/09/2018
> [ 962.309428] Workqueue: events_highpri intel_atomic_cleanup_work [i915]
> [ 962.309434] Call Trace:
> [ 962.309452] dump_stack+0xad/0x150
> [ 962.309462] ? dump_stack_print_info.cold.0+0x1b/0x1b
> [ 962.309472] ? kmsg_dump_rewind_nolock+0xd9/0xd9
> [ 962.309504] ? drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc+0x72/0x180 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.309515] print_address_description+0x6c/0x23c
> [ 962.309542] ? drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc+0x72/0x180 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.309568] ? drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc+0x72/0x180 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.309577] kasan_report.cold.3+0x1a/0x32
> [ 962.309605] ? drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc+0x72/0x180 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.309631] drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc+0x72/0x180 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.309658] ? drm_dp_mst_put_mstb_malloc+0x180/0x180 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.309687] drm_dp_mst_destroy_state+0xcd/0x120 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.309745] drm_atomic_state_default_clear+0x6ee/0xcc0 [drm]
> [ 962.309864] intel_atomic_state_clear+0xe/0x80 [i915]
> [ 962.309928] __drm_atomic_state_free+0x35/0xd0 [drm]
> [ 962.310044] intel_atomic_cleanup_work+0x56/0x70 [i915]
> [ 962.310057] process_one_work+0x884/0x1400
> [ 962.310067] ? drain_workqueue+0x5a0/0x5a0
> [ 962.310075] ? __schedule+0x87f/0x1e80
> [ 962.310086] ? __sched_text_start+0x8/0x8
> [ 962.310095] ? run_rebalance_domains+0x400/0x400
> [ 962.310110] ? deref_stack_reg+0xb4/0x120
> [ 962.310117] ? __read_once_size_nocheck.constprop.7+0x10/0x10
> [ 962.310124] ? worker_enter_idle+0x47f/0x6a0
> [ 962.310134] ? schedule+0xd7/0x2e0
> [ 962.310141] ? __schedule+0x1e80/0x1e80
> [ 962.310148] ? _raw_spin_lock_irq+0x9f/0x130
> [ 962.310155] ? _raw_write_unlock_irqrestore+0x110/0x110
> [ 962.310164] worker_thread+0x196/0x11e0
> [ 962.310175] ? set_load_weight+0x2e0/0x2e0
> [ 962.310181] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> [ 962.310187] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> [ 962.310194] ? process_one_work+0x1400/0x1400
> [ 962.310199] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> [ 962.310205] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> [ 962.310211] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> [ 962.310216] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> [ 962.310221] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> [ 962.310226] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> [ 962.310231] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> [ 962.310236] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> [ 962.310242] ? syscall_return_via_sysret+0xf/0x7f
> [ 962.310248] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> [ 962.310253] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> [ 962.310258] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> [ 962.310263] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> [ 962.310268] ? __switch_to_asm+0x34/0x70
> [ 962.310273] ? __switch_to_asm+0x40/0x70
> [ 962.310281] ? __schedule+0x87f/0x1e80
> [ 962.310292] ? __sched_text_start+0x8/0x8
> [ 962.310300] ? save_stack+0x8c/0xb0
> [ 962.310308] ? __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.6+0xc6/0xd0
> [ 962.310313] ? kthread+0x98/0x3a0
> [ 962.310318] ? ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
> [ 962.310334] ? __wake_up_common+0x178/0x6f0
> [ 962.310343] ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xa4/0x140
> [ 962.310349] ? __lock_text_start+0x8/0x8
> [ 962.310355] ? _raw_write_lock_irqsave+0x70/0x130
> [ 962.310360] ? __lock_text_start+0x8/0x8
> [ 962.310371] ? process_one_work+0x1400/0x1400
> [ 962.310376] kthread+0x2e2/0x3a0
> [ 962.310383] ? kthread_create_on_node+0xc0/0xc0
> [ 962.310389] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>
> [ 962.310401] Allocated by task 1462:
> [ 962.310410] __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.6+0xc6/0xd0
> [ 962.310437] drm_dp_add_port+0xd60/0x1960 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.310464] drm_dp_send_link_address+0x4b0/0x770 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.310491] drm_dp_check_and_send_link_address+0x197/0x1f0 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.310515] drm_dp_mst_link_probe_work+0x2b6/0x330 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.310522] process_one_work+0x884/0x1400
> [ 962.310529] worker_thread+0x196/0x11e0
> [ 962.310533] kthread+0x2e2/0x3a0
> [ 962.310538] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>
> [ 962.310543] Freed by task 500:
> [ 962.310550] __kasan_slab_free+0x133/0x180
> [ 962.310555] kfree+0x92/0x1a0
> [ 962.310581] drm_dp_mst_put_port_malloc+0x14d/0x180 [drm_kms_helper]
> [ 962.310693] intel_connector_destroy+0xb2/0xe0 [i915]
> [ 962.310747] drm_mode_object_put.part.0+0x12b/0x1a0 [drm]
> [ 962.310802] drm_atomic_state_default_clear+0x1f2/0xcc0 [drm]
> [ 962.310916] intel_atomic_state_clear+0xe/0x80 [i915]
> [ 962.310972] __drm_atomic_state_free+0x35/0xd0 [drm]
> [ 962.311083] intel_atomic_cleanup_work+0x56/0x70 [i915]
> [ 962.311092] process_one_work+0x884/0x1400
> [ 962.311098] worker_thread+0x196/0x11e0
> [ 962.311103] kthread+0x2e2/0x3a0
> [ 962.311108] ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40
>
> [ 962.311116] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888416c30000
> which belongs to the cache kmalloc-2k of size 2048
> [ 962.311122] The buggy address is located 4 bytes inside of
> 2048-byte region [ffff888416c30000, ffff888416c30800)
> [ 962.311124] The buggy address belongs to the page:
> [ 962.311132] page:ffffea00105b0c00 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff88841d003040 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
> [ 962.311142] flags: 0x8000000000010200(slab|head)
> [ 962.311152] raw: 8000000000010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff88841d003040
> [ 962.311159] raw: 0000000000000000 00000000000f000f 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
> [ 962.311162] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
>
> So, bail early if drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi() is called on a port with
> no VCPI allocation. Additionally, clean up the surrounding kerneldoc
> while we're at it since the port is assumed to be kept around because
> the DRM driver is expected to hold a malloc reference to it, not just
> us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Fixes: eceae1472467 ("drm/dp_mst: Start tracking per-port VCPI allocations")
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 2552a27362a0..8ba0e5b368da 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -3246,15 +3246,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots);
> /**
> * drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi() - deallocate a VCPI
> * @mgr: manager for this port
> - * @port: unverified port to deallocate vcpi for
> + * @port: port to deallocate vcpi for

Maybe add:

"This can be called unconditionally, whether drm_dp_mst_allocate_vcpi
succeeded or not."

Just to clarify this a bit more.

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

> */
> void drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> struct drm_dp_mst_port *port)
> {
> - /*
> - * A port with VCPI will remain allocated until it's VCPI is
> - * released, no verified ref needed
> - */
> + if (!port->vcpi.vcpi)
> + return;
>
> drm_dp_mst_put_payload_id(mgr, port->vcpi.vcpi);
> port->vcpi.num_slots = 0;
> --
> 2.20.1
>

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation