From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7D3C282C7 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 23:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464112184D for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 23:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="bqv/NYzz" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729939AbfA2XTG (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 18:19:06 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-f196.google.com ([209.85.210.196]:42247 "EHLO mail-pf1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727564AbfA2XTG (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 18:19:06 -0500 Received: by mail-pf1-f196.google.com with SMTP id 64so10422426pfr.9 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:19:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=yVMgdFOdFa/I4N9PyKEfemOmqSGsE9eLQyaSPEIZUh4=; b=bqv/NYzz8Z3PfkBSZ0khR8s+Ikhv8bAjGDfZfAsKr0cYvLOvNl4p/lBENoK9jKtbBK 0LGqePzhjJWF5MiCmkzcv4QzIsRtMaj5udtxUzNLGbf1T8Z0rfBSmwfVB/0+hTirJliZ iXCm6G6KehvWDNx9UXzEykSO/gvHCswwf9M0nQKFaCaNwiSUxJbqzhQ2I3/9ic7JNhTd db2AYu6ZHsP4Y06nGP0QrV8ql8TYVQLcqKVx2Fw/kY3ifjOcv2nzdy2OTKOORiDM0XBc m6dd0h9in9bbLz+V52UpSmW29qADs97NMsBJ+7ianAaBq+tX0zxyTy/YtZ4ScMR3YgFY nfWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=yVMgdFOdFa/I4N9PyKEfemOmqSGsE9eLQyaSPEIZUh4=; b=EnAMJCJEAJLPac6WqaMhKdRsgTMpG7cHn8iDVL90q1W6tHZ7r8waJVxTFRBXKVFzbf +ihy2DDm+Z3K51F/lRvixsG1w/Sf6+s0J/Jr+oPp2/TXFczTuKp74/pgs8VRLwgi+VFp TOvBm5TUt0SHdgLwhU44Ute6K0plJDpJAPYOv8n2GFI80/3rUEyPN99guVSMvmCZcyZB eKXmI4bXkHf0NNQbL3vNBjBpxWc0RStHYZL8abaKxmgnVPQkrcV0e1M3RCbvegWnvTcq v3jX6JkBUE2t0LFkdf7nAfNRUQj+J23CiRpWUoM8W4fLpCIF9zanYiXMo/g9hGJgHiRA YjRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfCxil9rUYmbrqBW7Vzx3PSFKgRrNEvKySctm1dYkZycknjHVMQ 9DPutANG0r7XNrOPiyKZJFrqLw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4vlgs6Ey3qXoCP5xMjiItYK8sdOidv0+c3ThlHFIF5qREgv8R63M+FeNhEYyAZGVWSBxZLZw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:9719:: with SMTP id n25mr29096346pfe.240.1548803945424; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:19:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca ([64.141.16.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k129sm45370743pgk.29.2019.01.29.15.19.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 15:19:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by jggl.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1gocel-0001Oi-7U; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:19:03 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:19:03 -0700 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Ira Weiny Cc: Davidlohr Bueso , akpm@linux-foundation.org, dledford@redhat.com, jack@suse.de, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dennis.dalessandro@intel.com, mike.marciniszyn@intel.com, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] drivers/IB,qib: do not use mmap_sem Message-ID: <20190129231903.GA5352@ziepe.ca> References: <20190121174220.10583-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20190121174220.10583-4-dave@stgolabs.net> <20190128233140.GA12530@ziepe.ca> <20190129044607.GL25106@ziepe.ca> <20190129185005.GC10129@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190129185005.GC10129@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 10:50:05AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote: > > .. and I'm looking at some of the other conversions here.. *most > > likely* any caller that is manipulating rlimit for get_user_pages > > should really be calling get_user_pages_longterm, so they should not > > be converted to use _fast? > > Is this a question? I'm not sure I understand the meaning here? More an invitation to disprove the statement Jason