public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi/arm: Don't expect a return value of ptdump_debugfs_register
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:44:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190204134445.GA22170@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu9tcpZvMZdbD0D+EUCTbdnszv3+MHM68utLZssuMcxyZw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 11:18:22PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 at 20:21, Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As of commit e2a2e56e4082 ("arm64: dump: no need to check return value
> > of debugfs_create functions") in the arm64 for-next/core branch,
> > ptdump_debugfs_register does not have a return value, which causes a
> > build error here:
> >
> > drivers/firmware/efi/arm-runtime.c:51:9: error: returning 'void' from a
> > function with incompatible result type 'int'
> >         return ptdump_debugfs_register(&efi_ptdump_info, "efi_page_tables");
> >                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 1 error generated.
> >
> > The arm version is still awaiting acceptance [1] but in anticipation
> > of that patch being merged, restructure this function to call
> > ptdump_debugfs_register without expecting a return value.
> >
> > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190122144114.9816-3-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> 
> 
> Catalin, Will,
> 
> Could you please apply this directly?

Sure, we'll pick it up.

Will

      reply	other threads:[~2019-02-04 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-01 19:20 [PATCH] efi/arm: Don't expect a return value of ptdump_debugfs_register Nathan Chancellor
2019-02-01 22:18 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-02-04 13:44   ` Will Deacon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190204134445.GA22170@fuggles.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=natechancellor@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox