From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AA0C282C4 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DE32082F for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 13:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731256AbfBDNMN (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 08:12:13 -0500 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:48237 "EHLO mail-out.m-online.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727630AbfBDNMM (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 08:12:12 -0500 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43tSm90W4kz1rTc3; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:12:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43tSm86VjJz1rVwW; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:12:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B0VpispFDhwX; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:12:07 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: L63B01QqYVC1himtUWDoBY7FJHs+tKmt/z67xdTb11I= Received: from jawa (85-222-111-42.dynamic.chello.pl [85.222.111.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:12:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:12:00 +0100 From: Lukasz Majewski To: Mark Brown Cc: Mark Rutland , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Esben Haabendal , Martin =?UTF-8?B?SHVuZGViw7hsbA==?= , Andrey Smirnov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ARM: dspi: Provide support for DSPI slave mode operation (Vybryd vf610) Message-ID: <20190204141200.05802849@jawa> In-Reply-To: <20190204130356.GF23441@sirena.org.uk> References: <20180927150709.17010-1-lukma@denx.de> <20190109082644.14941-1-lukma@denx.de> <20190204113001.77d59570@jawa> <20190204105737.GE23441@sirena.org.uk> <20190204135242.7112d48c@jawa> <20190204130356.GF23441@sirena.org.uk> Organization: denx.de X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/8KVRnqLykGiF8cTbKnYNiRq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/8KVRnqLykGiF8cTbKnYNiRq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark, > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:52:42PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 11:30:01AM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote: =20 >=20 > > > You've been sending ARM: patches to me (the SPI maintainer) and > > > one of the DT maintainers. =20 >=20 > ... >=20 > > Moreover, I've CC'ed developers (Esben, Andrey, Martin) involved in > > the changes for previous work done in this file/driver. =20 >=20 > > And those changes are solely related to SPI work in this driver, no > > ARM Vybrid. =20 >=20 > If they're SPI patches they should have a changelog that looks like a > SPI patch which means that it should start with "spi" (see other > patches on the list or git log for examples). When your patch > subject lines start with ARM: that means they are for arch/arm - I > don't 100% know but I suspect I've just not got far enough into the > mails to notice that they're for SPI, people do send a lot of patches > that just happen to mention buses to maintainers for those buses. In > general you should try to make sure that the subject line for your > patch matches the style used in the relevant subsystem. I see. Thanks for the detailed explanation. >=20 > > What else shall I do? =20 >=20 > You'll need to resend the patch, preferrably with a suitable subject > line. I will resend the patch with more suitable subject, no problem. Best regards, Lukasz Majewski -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de --Sig_/8KVRnqLykGiF8cTbKnYNiRq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEgAyFJ+N6uu6+XupJAR8vZIA0zr0FAlxYOiAACgkQAR8vZIA0 zr1MUwgA1g32KfI4g0bWQvIMTLGQl+Jp5F79SQbORRROkIuthN+bsLuSKHB1vBTy psXYERmEDkKzXnDseu8bPGOJnWX/X+xAjJVJWofNs45CfWVfekdD6/9SEKizi5NZ pdalPfUr+91F4RFt05INqh2ZjuH1pGyCfVqvszo3z7DrUAEyon3ADaeedAHVA8Aq 4woJ+Rnhz40nnqErV8T2rM75jt1UGpJ8/GoX4d5wJYIuR4bnNp3T08A3BWBM4bc1 5Em7TpzxsGeGL+oYTxG3FvBrY4J1l9tQtY+Ewzkf80Wj9N+EK5hUW43L2h6KwIDK aJql+tP6AV37pL1iMcXAHDAS40N9Ug== =1VQe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/8KVRnqLykGiF8cTbKnYNiRq--