From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=cBqk=QM=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6986C282D7
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  5 Feb 2019 15:17:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A894C20811
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Tue,  5 Feb 2019 15:17:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1729614AbfBEPRL (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:17:11 -0500
Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:16786 "EHLO mga18.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1729174AbfBEPRK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 5 Feb 2019 10:17:10 -0500
X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
  by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Feb 2019 07:17:10 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,564,1539673200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="124123918"
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.232.112.69])
  by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2019 07:17:09 -0800
Date:   Tue, 5 Feb 2019 08:16:36 -0700
From:   Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
To:     Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
Cc:     John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question on handling managed IRQs when hotplugging CPUs
Message-ID: <20190205151632.GA28064@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20190129172059.GC17132@localhost.localdomain>
 <3fe63dab-0791-f476-69c4-9866b70e8520@huawei.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1901301338170.5537@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <86d5028d-44ab-3696-f7fe-828d7655faa9@huawei.com>
 <745609be-b215-dd2d-c31f-0bd84572f49f@suse.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.1902012255550.8200@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
 <d93ff049-e96d-36ce-7e58-ec97cbb27ed0@suse.de>
 <42d149c5-0380-c357-8811-81015159ac04@huawei.com>
 <20190205145244.GB28023@localhost.localdomain>
 <0de6dae8-1234-3e3f-d8f3-2d8de47b7f9e@suse.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <0de6dae8-1234-3e3f-d8f3-2d8de47b7f9e@suse.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 04:10:47PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 2/5/19 3:52 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> > Whichever layer dispatched the IO to a CPU specific context should
> > be the one to wait for its completion. That should be blk-mq for most
> > block drivers.
> > 
> Indeed.
> But we don't provide any mechanisms for that ATM, right?
> 
> Maybe this would be a topic fit for LSF/MM?

Right, there's nothing handling this now, and sounds like it'd be a good
discussion to bring to the storage track.