From: Jon Mason <jdmason@kudzu.us>
To: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntb@googlegroups.com,
Allen Hubbe <allenbh@gmail.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Fix breakage caused by the NTB multi-port patchset
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:40:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211144034.GC13951@kudzu.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190109192233.5752-1-logang@deltatee.com>
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 12:22:25PM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm resending this because I've recently found out that the change we
> made to use the NTB struct device in DMA allocations is wrong and
> needs to be reverted. Turns out that, when running with an IOMMU,
> dma_alloc_coherent() will always fail if you pass it the NTB struct
> device. This is because the device has not been assigned an IOMMU
> group and the Intel IOMMU at least expect the devices to be on the PCI
> bus and be able to find a proper bus-dev-fn number through a struct
> pci device. Therefore, we must revert the change and I've changed
> patch 2 to do this and remove the no longer necessary DMA mask
> adjustments.
>
> I'm not sure if we can get past the impass in getting this series merged:
> I still maintain every patch in this series is necessary to fix a
> regression and there's no way to add port numbers to switchtec in the
> crosslink configuration so it can't be fixed in the other way that was
> suggested.
Given the need for this to get in (as it does fix actual problems) and
the absence of comments on v3, I'm adding this to the ntb-next branch.
If there is anyone that has anything more to say on this, please do so
immediately. Otherwise, I think this probably needs to be moved to the
ntb branch and go into 5.1-rc1.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Jon
>
> Logan
>
> --
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Rebased on v5.0-rc1
> - Modify Patch 2 to revert back to using the PCI struct device
> instead of the NTB struct device in DMA calls
> - Collected Allen's Acks
> - Collected Alexander's Tested-By
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Rebased onto ntb-next (there was a minor conflict in a recent change
> to the intel driver)
> - Collected Dave's Ack
>
> --
>
> Logan Gunthorpe (8):
> NTB: ntb_tool: reading the link file should not end in a NULL byte
> NTB: Revert the change to use the NTB device dev for DMA allocations
> NTB: Fix the default port and peer numbers for legacy drivers
> NTB: ntb_pingpong: Choose doorbells based on port number
> NTB: perf: Don't require one more memory window than number of peers
> NTB: perf: Fix support for hardware that doesn't have port numbers
> NTB: perf: Fix race condition when run with ntb_test
> NTB: ntb_test: Fix bug when counting remote files
>
> drivers/ntb/hw/amd/ntb_hw_amd.c | 4 ----
> drivers/ntb/hw/idt/ntb_hw_idt.c | 6 -----
> drivers/ntb/hw/intel/ntb_hw_gen1.c | 4 ----
> drivers/ntb/ntb.c | 9 ++------
> drivers/ntb/test/ntb_perf.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/ntb/test/ntb_pingpong.c | 14 +++++-------
> drivers/ntb/test/ntb_tool.c | 9 ++++----
> tools/testing/selftests/ntb/ntb_test.sh | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.19.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-11 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-09 19:22 [PATCH v3 0/8] Fix breakage caused by the NTB multi-port patchset Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] NTB: ntb_tool: reading the link file should not end in a NULL byte Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] NTB: Revert the change to use the NTB device dev for DMA allocations Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] NTB: Fix the default port and peer numbers for legacy drivers Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] NTB: ntb_pingpong: Choose doorbells based on port number Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] NTB: perf: Don't require one more memory window than number of peers Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] NTB: perf: Fix support for hardware that doesn't have port numbers Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] NTB: perf: Fix race condition when run with ntb_test Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 19:22 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] NTB: ntb_test: Fix bug when counting remote files Logan Gunthorpe
2019-01-09 19:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Fix breakage caused by the NTB multi-port patchset Dave Jiang
2019-01-09 19:33 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2019-02-11 14:40 ` Jon Mason [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190211144034.GC13951@kudzu.us \
--to=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=allenbh@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=fancer.lancer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ntb@googlegroups.com \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox