From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EB8C282C4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20622083B for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:51:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549957918; bh=h89bIy1gGz7dIVCWOHNe045YFf+I4lu0bKInGIHUIb4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=oVm8PET6TnZOITR/5O1Jbf5IR1wRQopAo5SH3S99LPN8txaEyReScVaccIWNvu/iw vP8xTiFK6kg1Pu0SLoTUH6h5vsgJgCFys27JMDxMFC1CYPwM7GROUuz/ZDQd8RDnYK H7hB8bT7OniBY8FxrTndyZrCHHRr3hBqj+hDuom0= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728221AbfBLHvz (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 02:51:55 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40654 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727248AbfBLHvz (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 02:51:55 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C8A1206BA; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 07:51:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1549957914; bh=h89bIy1gGz7dIVCWOHNe045YFf+I4lu0bKInGIHUIb4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=IiaCK30Wb20+z9z3x+HNzTWJ+3hN9Z2BL3isJkjAKhYKVEJq1J0wm/4nFWo2LVYxY TMSFRvCl01kWyVR5SJFhctqGnMGRn/TVLNNmIwRcDHc2o7JajtsV+kQGudkoTndeqq t/qfUzXiu9FrjHwhEA8jJhoySordsk2fc13WV6gA= Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 08:51:51 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jiri Slaby , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: drop ISA support in the synlink tty driver? Message-ID: <20190212075151.GA7588@kroah.com> References: <20190211132534.29407-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190211132534.29407-1-hch@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.3 (2019-02-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 02:25:33PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Greg and Jiri, > > I've been working hard to get rid of the remaining callers the pass a > NULL struct device to the DMA mapping functions and am almost done. > > The only non-trivial driver is the synclink driver, which has legacy > early 90s style ISA support that doesn't use the device model at all. > > In theory we could convert it to an isa_driver, but without testing > that seems rather dangerous. So for now I would suggest that we > remove the ISA support in this driver - if anyone cares enough we > can resurrect it from the git history and convert it to use the driver > model. No objection from me at all, I'll go queue this up now, thanks. greg k-h