From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15130C282C4 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09EB20818 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:19:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728675AbfBLKTz (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:19:55 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:36016 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726003AbfBLKTy (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:19:54 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1CAJ9ux043976 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:19:53 -0500 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qkt67nvb5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 05:19:53 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:19:51 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:19:47 -0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x1CAJk1Q55377984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:19:46 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C9311C058; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:19:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A8A11C050; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:19:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.59.139]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 10:19:45 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:19:43 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Michal Hocko Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Pingfan Liu , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , x86@kernel.org, Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , Tony Luck , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes References: <20190212095343.23315-1-mhocko@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190212095343.23315-1-mhocko@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19021210-0016-0000-0000-0000025576C3 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19021210-0017-0000-0000-000032AF976F Message-Id: <20190212101942.GA20902@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-02-12_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=650 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902120076 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:53:41AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote: > Hi, > this has been posted as an RFC previously [1]. There didn't seem to be > any objections so I am reposting this for inclusion. I have added a > debugging patch which prints the zonelist setup for each numa node > for an easier debugging of a broken zonelist setup. > > [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190114082416.30939-1-mhocko@kernel.org FWIW, Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport for the series. -- Sincerely yours, Mike.