public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] driver core: Fixes related to device links
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 16:06:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190212150618.GB19188@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFoSGO5Y8wOF8Jd=b7DDSz6Lb2M4+pn7EXOJ4U_AFz+4gQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 03:52:53PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 at 15:09, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 01:01:13PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Hi Greg at al,
> > >
> > > These fix two issues on top of the recent device links material in
> > > driver-core/driver-core-next.
> > >
> > > The first one fixes a race condition that may trigger when
> > > __pm_runtime_set_status() is used incorrectly (that is, when it is
> > > called with PM-runtime enabled for the target device and working).
> > >
> > > The second one fixes a supplier PM-runtime usage counter imbalance
> > > resulting from adding and removing (e.g. in the error code path) a
> > > stateless device link to it from within the consumer driver's probe
> > > callback.
> > >
> > > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details.
> >
> > Looks good, all now queued up, thanks.
> 
> Greg, please don't get me wrong, but ~1.5 hours isn't sufficient for
> me to review/test submitted patches.
> 
> I have been trying to collaborate (review/test) device links related
> code with Rafael, but what's the point if you queue up the patches,
> before I even got the change to look at them. Shall I interpret it as
> you don't care about me reviewing this, then just tell me so I don't
> have to waste my time.

As they are just in my -testing branch, I can easily drop them now if
you find problems.  I didn't realize that Rafael was wanting you to
review this as they were marked as "fixes:" for previous patches.

thanks,

greg k-h

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-12 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-12 12:01 [PATCH 0/2] driver core: Fixes related to device links Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM-runtime: Fix __pm_runtime_set_status() race with runtime resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 16:17   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-12 16:28     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 18:27       ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-12 19:05         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 20:14   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-12 12:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 21:02   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-12 22:08     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-15 11:00   ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-15 11:57     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-15 12:06     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-15 13:21       ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-15 14:14         ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-15 14:37     ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-15 16:44       ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-17 21:33         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-18 12:12         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-18 13:02           ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-18 22:14             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 14:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] driver core: Fixes related to device links Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-12 14:52   ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-12 15:04     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 15:06     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2019-02-12 16:20       ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190212150618.GB19188@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox