From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63983C4360F for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6E921927 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394433AbfBNRES (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:04:18 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:51880 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732722AbfBNRES (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Feb 2019 12:04:18 -0500 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 900266FA8C; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:04:16 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 18:04:16 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , Palmer Dabbelt , Richard Kuo , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation Message-ID: <20190214170416.GA32441@lst.de> References: <1550159977-8949-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1550159977-8949-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This look fine to me, but I'm a little worried that as-is this will just create conflicts with my series..