public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
	Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
	Shivasharan Srikanteshwara 
	<shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>
Subject: [patch V5 7/8] genirq/affinity: Set is_managed in the spreading function
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 21:48:02 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190214211759.981965829@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20190214204755.819014197@linutronix.de

Some drivers need an extra set of interrupts which are not marked managed,
but should get initial interrupt spreading.

To achieve this it is simpler to set the is_managed bit of the affinity
descriptor in the spreading function instead of having yet another loop and
tons of conditionals.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/irq/affinity.c |   18 ++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/irq/affinity.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/affinity.c
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(co
 				      unsigned int startvec,
 				      unsigned int numvecs,
 				      unsigned int firstvec,
+				      bool managed,
 				      cpumask_var_t *node_to_cpumask,
 				      const struct cpumask *cpu_mask,
 				      struct cpumask *nmsk,
@@ -154,6 +155,7 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(co
 			}
 			irq_spread_init_one(&masks[curvec].mask, nmsk,
 						cpus_per_vec);
+			masks[curvec].is_managed = managed;
 		}
 
 		done += v;
@@ -173,7 +175,7 @@ static int __irq_build_affinity_masks(co
  */
 static int irq_build_affinity_masks(const struct irq_affinity *affd,
 				    unsigned int startvec, unsigned int numvecs,
-				    unsigned int firstvec,
+				    unsigned int firstvec, bool managed,
 				    struct irq_affinity_desc *masks)
 {
 	unsigned int curvec = startvec, nr_present, nr_others;
@@ -197,8 +199,8 @@ static int irq_build_affinity_masks(cons
 	build_node_to_cpumask(node_to_cpumask);
 
 	/* Spread on present CPUs starting from affd->pre_vectors */
-	nr_present = __irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, numvecs,
-						firstvec, node_to_cpumask,
+	nr_present = __irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, numvecs, firstvec,
+						managed, node_to_cpumask,
 						cpu_present_mask, nmsk, masks);
 
 	/*
@@ -212,8 +214,8 @@ static int irq_build_affinity_masks(cons
 	else
 		curvec = firstvec + nr_present;
 	cpumask_andnot(npresmsk, cpu_possible_mask, cpu_present_mask);
-	nr_others = __irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, numvecs,
-					       firstvec, node_to_cpumask,
+	nr_others = __irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, numvecs, firstvec,
+					       managed, node_to_cpumask,
 					       npresmsk, nmsk, masks);
 	put_online_cpus();
 
@@ -290,7 +292,7 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(unsigned int n
 		int ret;
 
 		ret = irq_build_affinity_masks(affd, curvec, this_vecs,
-					       curvec, masks);
+					       true, curvec, masks);
 		if (ret) {
 			kfree(masks);
 			return NULL;
@@ -307,10 +309,6 @@ irq_create_affinity_masks(unsigned int n
 	for (; curvec < nvecs; curvec++)
 		cpumask_copy(&masks[curvec].mask, irq_default_affinity);
 
-	/* Mark the managed interrupts */
-	for (i = affd->pre_vectors; i < nvecs - affd->post_vectors; i++)
-		masks[i].is_managed = 1;
-
 	return masks;
 }
 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-14 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-14 20:47 [patch V5 0/8] genirq/affinity: Overhaul the multiple interrupt sets support Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:47 ` [patch V5 1/8] genirq/affinity: Code consolidation Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:47 ` [patch V5 2/8] genirq/affinity: Store interrupt sets size in struct irq_affinity Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:47 ` [patch V5 3/8] genirq/affinity: Add new callback for (re)calculating interrupt sets Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:47 ` [patch V5 4/8] nvme-pci: Simplify interrupt allocation Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 22:41   ` Ming Lei
2019-02-14 23:55     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-15 23:00       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-15  9:24   ` Marc Zyngier
2019-02-15  9:52     ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-15  9:54       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:48 ` [patch V5 5/8] genirq/affinity: Remove the leftovers of the original set support Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:48 ` [patch V5 6/8] PCI/MSI: Remove obsolete sanity checks for multiple interrupt sets Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-14 20:48 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-02-14 20:48 ` [patch V5 8/8] genirq/affinity: Add support for non-managed affinity sets Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190214211759.981965829@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox