From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96E0C43381 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8501E217F9 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729425AbfBRJtv (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 04:49:51 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:43927 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727423AbfBRJtu (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 04:49:50 -0500 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 64A3B68D93; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:49:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:49:48 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mike Rapoport Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Palmer Dabbelt , Richard Kuo , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] provide a generic free_initmem implementation Message-ID: <20190218094948.GA5892@lst.de> References: <1550159977-8949-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.ibm.com> <20190214170416.GA32441@lst.de> <20190214183854.GA10795@rapoport-lnx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190214183854.GA10795@rapoport-lnx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 08:38:55PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 06:04:16PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > This look fine to me, but I'm a little worried that as-is this will > > just create conflicts with my series.. > > I'll rebase on top of your patches once they are in. Or I can send both > series as a single set. > Preferences? So far there wasn't really much a reason to rebase my series, hope this gets picked up either by Andrew or Al (not sure what the right place is). I think for now just rebase your series on top, we can then figure out how to proceed.