From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf tools: Add numa_topology object
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 15:20:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190218142042.GA13284@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cjEaUmYhduf2ddgxOAZw9=1NfsNTScwZZENPzXvUyMBaw@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:08:55PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Jirka,
>
> On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 8:39 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Adding numa_topology object to return the list of numa
> > nodes together with their cpus. It will replace the numa
> > code in header.c and will be used from perf record code
> > in following patches.
> >
> > Adding following interface functions to load numa details:
> >
> > struct numa_topology *numa_topology__new(void);
> > void numa_topology__delete(struct numa_topology *tp);
> >
> > And replacing current (copied) local interface, with no
> > functional changes.
> >
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-rn15st6hjj7txg2i88v7yff4@git.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/cputopo.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/util/cputopo.h | 16 +++++
> > tools/perf/util/header.c | 119 +++++++++----------------------------
> > 3 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cputopo.c b/tools/perf/util/cputopo.c
> > index 84470ed4e707..daac3cf90b12 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/cputopo.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/cputopo.c
> > @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
> > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > #include <sys/param.h>
> > +#include <inttypes.h>
> >
> > #include "cputopo.h"
> > #include "cpumap.h"
> > #include "util.h"
> > +#include "env.h"
> >
> >
> > #define CORE_SIB_FMT \
> > @@ -142,3 +144,121 @@ struct cpu_topology *cpu_topology__new(void)
> > }
> > return tp;
> > }
> > +
> > +static int load_numa_node(struct numa_topology_node *node, int nr)
> > +{
> > + char str[MAXPATHLEN];
> > + char field[32];
> > + char *buf = NULL, *p;
> > + size_t len = 0;
> > + int ret = -1;
> > + FILE *fp;
> > + u64 mem;
> > +
> > + node->node = (u32) nr;
> > +
> > + sprintf(str, "/sys/devices/system/node/node%d/meminfo", nr);
>
> Why not using similar macro like NODE_MEMINFO_FMT?
> Also it'd be better using snprintf() or scnprintf() instead.
right, that code needs to be changed to take /sys from sysfs__mountpoint
but I wanted just to move the code now, with only necessary changes,
like the issues you found below ;-)
>
>
> > + fp = fopen(str, "r");
> > + if (!fp)
> > + return -1;
> > +
> > + while (getline(&buf, &len, fp) > 0) {
> > + /* skip over invalid lines */
> > + if (!strchr(buf, ':'))
> > + continue;
> > + if (sscanf(buf, "%*s %*d %31s %"PRIu64, field, &mem) != 2)
> > + goto err;
> > + if (!strcmp(field, "MemTotal:"))
> > + node->mem_total = mem;
> > + if (!strcmp(field, "MemFree:"))
> > + node->mem_free = mem;
> > + if (node->mem_total && node->mem_free)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fclose(fp);
> > + fp = NULL;
> > + buf = NULL;
>
> No need to make them NULL. Also it'd leak buf..
oops, I'll put free in here
>
>
> > +
> > + ret = -1;
>
> It's not changed yet.
right, will change
thanks,
jirka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-18 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-18 11:39 [PATCHv2 0/3] perf tools: Assorted fixes Jiri Olsa
2019-02-18 11:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf header: Fix wrong node write in NUMA_TOPOLOGY feature Jiri Olsa
2019-02-18 11:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf tools: Add cpu_topology object Jiri Olsa
2019-02-18 11:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf tools: Add numa_topology object Jiri Olsa
2019-02-18 14:08 ` Namhyung Kim
2019-02-18 14:20 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190218142042.GA13284@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox