From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.ibm.com>,
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
oberpar@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zcrypt: handle AP Info notification from CHSC SEI command
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 13:55:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190221125502.GB4221@osiris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190221131240.0ab463d1.cohuck@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 01:12:40PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:42:25 +0100
> Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On 30.01.19 19:32, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, Tony Krowiak wrote:
>
> > >> /*
> > >> +* A config change has happened, Force an ap bus rescan.
> > >> +*/
> > >> +void ap_bus_cfg_chg(void)
> > >> +{
> > >> + AP_DBF(DBF_INFO, "%s config change, forcing bus rescan\n", __func__);
> > >> +
> > >> + ap_bus_force_rescan();
> > >> +}
> > >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ap_bus_cfg_chg);
> > > There is no need for the export symbol - you don't call that function
> > > from module code.
> > That's what I have learned now: You don't need to export a symbol
> > as long as the symbol is only called in static code parts of the kernel.
> > But you need to export it when it is intended to be used by code
> > which sits in a kernel module. So now the big question:
> > How does a provider of a function in the kernel know, if the caller is in static
> > code or in module code ? And ... maybe this may even change over
> > the time. So my recommendation is to always export the symbol with
> > the EXPORT_SYMBOL macro. This way you don't need to change the
> > code providing a function when the caller code changes or additional
> > code uses the symbol.
> >
> > Other opinions ?
>
> Well, if you know it will be called from module code in upcoming
> patches, export it. If not, I consider it the choice of the maintainer.
> You can easily add the export later on, if needed, anyway, and I don't
> consider changing the code a problem.
>
> In this particular case, both exporting and not exporting looked like
> reasonable choices to me.
The number of exported symbols should be as small as possible. Each
exported symbol eats up extra memory for meta information, plus I
really do not want to deal with semi-automated bots sending patches to
remove not needed exported symbols.
You can check usage of exported symbols with "make export_report".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-21 12:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-30 17:48 [PATCH] zcrypt: handle AP Info notification from CHSC SEI command Tony Krowiak
2019-01-30 18:32 ` Sebastian Ott
2019-01-31 23:28 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-01 9:01 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-02-01 11:08 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2019-02-01 13:05 ` Heiko Carstens
2019-02-01 15:40 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-01 15:38 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-04 10:06 ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-02-05 20:26 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-04 10:01 ` Sebastian Ott
2019-02-05 20:27 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-21 10:42 ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-02-21 12:12 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-21 12:55 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2019-01-31 9:09 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-31 23:32 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-01-31 9:23 ` Pierre Morel
2019-01-31 9:55 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-01-31 23:50 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-01 14:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-01 15:50 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-04 10:15 ` Harald Freudenberger
2019-02-04 12:07 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-02-05 20:30 ` Tony Krowiak
2019-02-03 9:25 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190221125502.GB4221@osiris \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=sebott@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox