From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=3gpS=RA=vger.kernel.org=linux-kernel-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
	DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,
	USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868B5C43381
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:37:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B8D920684
	for <linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:37:03 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="rrj2/uoM"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1728209AbfBYQhB (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:37:01 -0500
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:43400 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1727984AbfBYQhB (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 25 Feb 2019 11:37:01 -0500
Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2BC68000181F50CD76FD5D93.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bc6:8000:181f:50cd:76fd:5d93])
        (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 441BC1EC0324;
        Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:37:00 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim;
        t=1551112620;
        h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
         to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
         content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:  references:references;
        bh=7ia2ezpdJaj/vvYkLhYK4DQNOOn3+ArCe5GnOV2noMc=;
        b=rrj2/uoML6c7iuch5uA3bhqeUsbBUonOmRyaCCTSNlAq3XczEEKvMKofkHlE8hD8sHcdDA
        2ulqUT4W1lA7J8buH7Sq5lW0OvVlrRu//Jj1DDkhAGCnvnjeye3uHDhBhUGi4hEC2dkT7D
        PpoiHLo3aFPWSun623d1Gg8zaBRyJnA=
Date:   Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:36:51 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, valentin.schneider@arm.com,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/uaccess: Dont evaluate argument inside AC region
Message-ID: <20190225163651.GG26145@zn.tnic>
References: <20190225124330.613028745@infradead.org>
 <20190225125231.845656645@infradead.org>
 <CALCETrWQpG2aOxxeoNXUPD-A7h3j4NSTqoN+vN9Nr2E_Fo19zg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrWQpG2aOxxeoNXUPD-A7h3j4NSTqoN+vN9Nr2E_Fo19zg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 07:43:53AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I put a slightly fancier version here last night so that the 0day bot
> could chew on it:

I'm guessing 0day bot didn't complain so far? Or should we give it one
more day?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.