From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B1FC43381 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C3E2184D for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:30:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551130207; bh=dE/iQ0mkfd1tdtaUG4B9ZSWxMPbsFeJfS0Josjyfwc8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=sE1RHusp0IGkzQw4ZE9SjUl/nWd2aD7vueV3eiHymwfMJdG6KLm3bVr5vRCmfVJgE POE+23Hzadw9LsFM+zguzHgjhbXSokmpy/WLjnBignzIhFJW39ag05iKo/kdcmi+Kd V3pJdL36I3q7mDtnWsxgfLWI/V6U3v8JXKmMNvUo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732092AbfBYVaG (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:30:06 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35734 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732080AbfBYVaC (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2019 16:30:02 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 298DD217F5; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551130201; bh=dE/iQ0mkfd1tdtaUG4B9ZSWxMPbsFeJfS0Josjyfwc8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=v+exfZuB1P1tKbJ0unkY8OYbeBY/ZofMY3N2OqjXgSPp/EpV5Qa0hSyEkZalrd07F U9Z4G8nCk7b5epf2TdbR7/qyP3rxqXwZzkmLSQiM2dVHFlCrXtSR2dUOCM0JiSo5gH Xz61R0zkaIYas8q8lbvrWEP4lirL8MmWK70HWjd8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Andrey Ignatov , Alexei Starovoitov , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.20 046/183] selftests/bpf: Test [::] -> [::1] rewrite in sys_sendmsg in test_sock_addr Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:10:19 +0100 Message-Id: <20190225195102.357898615@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190225195054.748060397@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190225195054.748060397@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit 976b4f3a4646fbf0d189caca25f91f82e4be4b5a ] Test that sys_sendmsg BPF hook doesn't break sys_sendmsg behaviour to rewrite destination IPv6 = [::] with [::1] (BSD'ism). Two test cases are added: 1) User passes dst IPv6 = [::] and BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG program doesn't touch it. 2) User passes dst IPv6 != [::], but BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG program rewrites it with [::]. In both cases [::1] is used by sys_sendmsg code eventually and datagram is sent successfully for unconnected UDP socket. Example of relevant output: Test case: sendmsg6: set dst IP = [::] (BSD'ism) .. [PASS] Test case: sendmsg6: preserve dst IP = [::] (BSD'ism) .. [PASS] Signed-off-by: Andrey Ignatov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c index aeeb76a54d633..e38f1cb7089d3 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock_addr.c @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ #define SERV6_V4MAPPED_IP "::ffff:192.168.0.4" #define SRC6_IP "::1" #define SRC6_REWRITE_IP "::6" +#define WILDCARD6_IP "::" #define SERV6_PORT 6060 #define SERV6_REWRITE_PORT 6666 @@ -85,12 +86,14 @@ static int bind4_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); static int bind6_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); static int connect4_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); static int connect6_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); +static int sendmsg_allow_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); static int sendmsg_deny_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); static int sendmsg4_rw_asm_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); static int sendmsg4_rw_c_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); static int sendmsg6_rw_asm_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); static int sendmsg6_rw_c_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); static int sendmsg6_rw_v4mapped_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); +static int sendmsg6_rw_wildcard_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test); static struct sock_addr_test tests[] = { /* bind */ @@ -462,6 +465,34 @@ static struct sock_addr_test tests[] = { SRC6_REWRITE_IP, SYSCALL_ENOTSUPP, }, + { + "sendmsg6: set dst IP = [::] (BSD'ism)", + sendmsg6_rw_wildcard_prog_load, + BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, + BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, + AF_INET6, + SOCK_DGRAM, + SERV6_IP, + SERV6_PORT, + SERV6_REWRITE_IP, + SERV6_REWRITE_PORT, + SRC6_REWRITE_IP, + SUCCESS, + }, + { + "sendmsg6: preserve dst IP = [::] (BSD'ism)", + sendmsg_allow_prog_load, + BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, + BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, + AF_INET6, + SOCK_DGRAM, + WILDCARD6_IP, + SERV6_PORT, + SERV6_REWRITE_IP, + SERV6_PORT, + SRC6_IP, + SUCCESS, + }, { "sendmsg6: deny call", sendmsg_deny_prog_load, @@ -714,16 +745,27 @@ static int connect6_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test) return load_path(test, CONNECT6_PROG_PATH); } -static int sendmsg_deny_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test) +static int sendmsg_ret_only_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test, + int32_t rc) { struct bpf_insn insns[] = { - /* return 0 */ - BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + /* return rc */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, rc), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }; return load_insns(test, insns, sizeof(insns) / sizeof(struct bpf_insn)); } +static int sendmsg_allow_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test) +{ + return sendmsg_ret_only_prog_load(test, /*rc*/ 1); +} + +static int sendmsg_deny_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test) +{ + return sendmsg_ret_only_prog_load(test, /*rc*/ 0); +} + static int sendmsg4_rw_asm_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test) { struct sockaddr_in dst4_rw_addr; @@ -844,6 +886,11 @@ static int sendmsg6_rw_v4mapped_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test) return sendmsg6_rw_dst_asm_prog_load(test, SERV6_V4MAPPED_IP); } +static int sendmsg6_rw_wildcard_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test) +{ + return sendmsg6_rw_dst_asm_prog_load(test, WILDCARD6_IP); +} + static int sendmsg6_rw_c_prog_load(const struct sock_addr_test *test) { return load_path(test, SENDMSG6_PROG_PATH); -- 2.19.1