From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
luto@kernel.org, Jiufei Xue <jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com>,
Xu Yu <xuyu@linux.alibaba.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [bug report][stable] perf probe: failed to add events
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:20:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190226142009.GC26786@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190226130802.GA10343@kroah.com>
Em Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:08:02PM +0100, Greg KH escreveu:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:32:34PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 19/2/26 17:05, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 03:31:14PM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I'm using kernel v4.19.24 and have found that there is an issue when
> > >> using perf probe to define a new dynamic tracepoint.
> > >>
> > >> $ perf probe -a handle_mm_fault
> > >> Failed to write event: Numerical result out of range
> > >> Error: Failed to add events.
> > >>
> > >> I've also tried kernel v4.20, and it can pass.
> > >
> > > Ick, has this ever worked on the 4.19 stable tree? If so, any chance
> > > you can run 'git bisect' to find the offending commit?
> > >
> > >From my test, v4.19.0 also has this issue.
> > Bisect locates that it is introduced by commit bf904d2762ee
> > "x86/pti/64: Remove the SYSCALL64 entry trampoline".
>
> But that commit was in 4.20, not 4.19. So if this never worked, it's
> not a regression?
>
> confused,
Adrian, Ideas?
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-26 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-26 7:31 [bug report][stable] perf probe: failed to add events Joseph Qi
2019-02-26 9:05 ` Greg KH
2019-02-26 12:32 ` Joseph Qi
2019-02-26 13:08 ` Greg KH
2019-02-26 14:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2019-02-27 12:39 ` Adrian Hunter
2019-02-28 2:07 ` Joseph Qi
2019-02-28 7:19 ` Adrian Hunter
2019-03-02 10:58 ` Joseph Qi
2019-03-04 13:13 ` [PATCH] perf probe: Fix getting the kernel map Adrian Hunter
2019-03-08 14:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-03-11 9:23 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2019-03-22 22:01 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Adrian Hunter
2019-03-21 10:10 ` [bug report][stable] perf probe: failed to add events Greg KH
2019-03-25 10:02 ` Adrian Hunter
2019-02-27 1:53 ` Joseph Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190226142009.GC26786@kernel.org \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jiufei.xue@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=xuyu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox