From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] v2 multi-die/package topology support
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:51:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190226185131.GP2861@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190226062012.23746-1-lenb@kernel.org>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:19:58AM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> Restored sysfs core_siblings, core_siblings_list
>
> v1 proposed re-defining this existing attribute to
> be the threads in a die, rather than in a package.
>
> For compatibility, decided rather to keep this
> attribute unchanged, for now, even though
> its name makes little sense, and it makes
> no sense in a multi-die system.
So why do things that make no sense? What breaks?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-26 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-26 6:19 [PATCH 0/14] v2 multi-die/package topology support Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:19 ` [PATCH 01/14] x86 topology: Fix doc typo Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 02/14] topolgy: Simplify cputopology.txt formatting and wording Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 03/14] x86 smpboot: Rename match_die() to match_pkg() Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 04/14] x86 topology: Add CPUID.1F multi-die/package support Len Brown
2019-02-26 19:46 ` Dave Hansen
2019-02-28 15:43 ` Len Brown
2019-04-05 18:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 05/14] cpu topology: Export die_id Len Brown
2019-03-07 14:45 ` Morten Rasmussen
2019-03-26 18:18 ` Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 06/14] x86 topology: Define topology_logical_die_id() Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 07/14] powercap/intel_rapl: Simplify rapl_find_package() Len Brown
2019-02-26 19:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-26 18:27 ` Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 08/14] powercap/intel_rapl: Support multi-die/package Len Brown
2019-04-05 18:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-08 1:35 ` Zhang Rui
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 09/14] thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal: " Len Brown
2019-04-05 18:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-05 18:39 ` Brown, Len
2019-04-05 18:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 10/14] powercap/intel_rapl: update rapl domain name and debug messages Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 11/14] hwmon/coretemp: Support multi-die/package Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 12/14] topology: Create package_threads sysfs attribute Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 13/14] topology: Create core_threads " Len Brown
2019-02-26 6:20 ` [PATCH 14/14] topology: Create die_threads " Len Brown
2019-02-26 18:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-04-12 19:32 ` [PATCH 0/14] v2 multi-die/package topology support Len Brown
2019-02-26 18:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-07 14:59 ` Morten Rasmussen
2019-04-05 18:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-12 19:52 ` Len Brown
2019-04-12 20:40 ` Brice Goglin
2019-02-26 19:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-30 6:50 ` Len Brown
2019-04-30 9:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-30 18:46 ` Len Brown
2019-04-05 18:33 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190226185131.GP2861@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox