From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@linux-watchdog.org>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: sbc60xxwdt: Mark expected switch fall-through
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 12:59:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190226205946.GA21115@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190226175835.GA12199@embeddedor>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:58:35AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
> cases where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> This patch fixes the following warning:
>
> drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c: In function ‘fop_ioctl’:
> drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c:272:3: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
> wdt_keepalive();
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c:275:2: note: here
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> ^~~~
>
> Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified
> in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
>
> This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c
> index 87333a41f753..72d15fd1f183 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/sbc60xxwdt.c
> @@ -270,8 +270,8 @@ static long fop_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>
> timeout = new_timeout;
> wdt_keepalive();
> - /* Fall through */
> }
> + /* Fall through */
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> return put_user(timeout, p);
> default:
> --
> 2.20.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-26 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-26 17:58 [PATCH] watchdog: sbc60xxwdt: Mark expected switch fall-through Gustavo A. R. Silva
2019-02-26 20:59 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190226205946.GA21115@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox