From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: x86 VM Boot hang with latest linux-next
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 23:07:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190305040714.GB21739@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0Ue9+wSL60Bj0drkgVQwem=mh_eTrFMda+inX4=qBgi3dA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 03 2019 at 12:06pm -0500,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 7:48 PM Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 02 2019 at 6:34pm -0500,
> > Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > So I have been seeing an issue with an intermittent boot hang on my
> > > x86 KVM VM with the latest linux-next and have bisected it down to the
> > > following commit:
> > > 1efa3bb79d3de8ca1b7f6770313a1fc0bebe25c7 is the first bad commit
> > > commit 1efa3bb79d3de8ca1b7f6770313a1fc0bebe25c7
> > > Author: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> > > Date: Fri Feb 22 11:23:01 2019 -0500
> > >
> > > dm: must allocate dm_noclone for stacked noclone devices
> > >
> > > Otherwise various lvm2 testsuite tests fail because the lower layers of
> > > the stacked noclone device aren't updated to allocate a new 'struct
> > > dm_clone' that reflects the upper layer bio that was issued to it.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 97a89458020b38 ("dm: improve noclone bio support")
> > > Reported-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > What I am seeing is in about 3 out of 4 boots the startup just hangs
> > > at the filesystem check stage with the following message:
> > > [ OK ] Reached target Local File Systems (Pre).
> > > Starting File System Check on /dev/…127-ad57-426f-bb45-363950544c0c...
> > > [ **] (1 of 2) A start job is running for…n on device 252:2 (19s / no limit)
> > >
> > > I did some googling and it looks like a similar issue has been
> > > reported for s390. Based on the request for data there I have the
> > > following info:
> > > [root@localhost ~]# dmsetup ls --tree
> > > fedora-swap (253:1)
> > > └─ (252:2)
> > > fedora-root (253:0)
> > > └─ (252:2)
> > >
> > > [root@localhost ~]# dmsetup table
> > > fedora-swap: 0 4194304 linear 252:2 2048
> > > fedora-root: 0 31457280 linear 252:2 4196352
> >
> > Thanks, which version of Fedora are you running?
>
> The VM is running Fedora 27 with a kernel built off of latest
> linux-next as of March 1st.
>
> > Your case is more straightforward in that you're clearly using bio-based
> > DM linear (which was updated to leverage "noclone" support); whereas the
> > s390 case is using request-based DM which isn't impacted by the commit
> > in question at all.
> >
> > I'll attempt to reproduce first thing Monday.
> >
> > Mike
>
> Thanks. The behavior of it has me wondering if we are looking at
> something like an uninitialized data issue or something like that
> since as I mentioned I don't see this occur on every boot, just on
> most of them. So every now and then I can boot up the VM without any
> issues, but most of the time it will boot and then get stuck waiting
> on jobs that take forever.
I just copied you on another related thread, but for the benefit of
anyone on LKML, please see the following for a fix that works for me:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2019-March/msg00027.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-05 4:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-02 23:34 x86 VM Boot hang with latest linux-next Alexander Duyck
2019-03-03 3:48 ` Mike Snitzer
2019-03-03 17:06 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-03-04 23:02 ` Mike Snitzer
2019-03-05 4:07 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190305040714.GB21739@redhat.com \
--to=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox