From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.cz>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@redhat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/gart/kcore: Exclude GART aperture from kcore
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 17:03:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190306090307.GG14858@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACPcB9e5+-3TrZ-nQc37-0nayU0RSMo-T4V+h4nEaHJ8Mqryqw@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/06/19 at 04:48pm, Kairui Song wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 4:00 PM Kairui Song <kasong@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Baoquan, after second thought, vmcore and kcore are doing similar
> thing but still quite independent of each, didn't see any simple way
> to share the logic.
> And for the following naming issue I think considering the context
> there is no problem, "exclude_from_vmcore(aper_alloc, aper_order)" is
> clearly doing what it literally means, excluding the aperture from
> vmcore.
>
> Let me know if anything is wrong, will send V4 later reuse this approach.
Thanks for the effort.
Yes, saw your v3. I kept quiet because I personally prefer the v2 method
which is similar to vmcore handling. So if you have investigated and
decided to do v2 way after deliberate thought, feel free to post v4. I
will make time to review.
Thanks
Baoquan
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-06 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-02 10:54 [PATCH v2] x86/gart/kcore: Exclude GART aperture from kcore Kairui Song
2019-01-23 14:14 ` Baoquan He
2019-01-23 14:50 ` Kairui Song
2019-01-24 2:17 ` Baoquan He
2019-02-19 8:00 ` Kairui Song
2019-03-06 8:48 ` Kairui Song
2019-03-06 9:03 ` Baoquan He [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190306090307.GG14858@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
--to=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhsharma@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbohac@suse.cz \
--cc=kasong@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=osandov@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox