From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwish.07@gmail.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: kmsg_dump: Mark registered flag as private
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 18:34:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190312093435.GA15673@jagdpanzerIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190312091810.gm6q7ao6u2lpsnqh@pathway.suse.cz>
On (03/12/19 10:18), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > * @max_reason: filter for highest reason number that should be dumped
> > > - * @registered: Flag that specifies if this is already registered
> > > + * @registered: Flag that specifies if this is already registered (private)
> > > */
> > > struct kmsg_dumper {
> > > struct list_head list;
> >
[..]
> This is another field in the same structure. There are 4 other fields
> that are described as private by extra comment. Thefore this patch
> might make it more consistent.
Well, no objections from my side. At the same time nothing in kmsg_dump.h
suggests that "(private)" stands for "protected by logbuf_lock". Even more,
that struct has another "private" members, which are protected by
logbuf_lock - cur_idx, next_idx, cur_srq, next_seq; except when they are
not (see kmsg_dump_get_line_nolock() and other _nolock() functions). So
"private" has conflicting meanings.
struct kmsg_dumper {
struct list_head list;
void (*dump)(struct kmsg_dumper *dumper, enum kmsg_dump_reason reason);
enum kmsg_dump_reason max_reason;
bool active;
bool registered;
/* private state of the kmsg iterator */
u32 cur_idx;
u32 next_idx;
u64 cur_seq;
u64 next_seq;
};
>
> Well, I am not sure if it is worth it. Andrew?
>
Agreed.
-ss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-12 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-10 20:03 [PATCH] printk: kmsg_dump: Mark registered flag as private Ahmed S. Darwish
2019-03-11 12:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-03-12 9:18 ` Petr Mladek
2019-03-12 9:34 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2019-03-12 20:05 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190312093435.GA15673@jagdpanzerIV \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darwish.07@gmail.com \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox