From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C2FC43381 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5113221873 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:51:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727369AbfCNKv4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Mar 2019 06:51:56 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:42122 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726629AbfCNKvz (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Mar 2019 06:51:55 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4586780D; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 03:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e107155-lin (e107155-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.196.42]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 514E83F71D; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 03:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 10:51:44 +0000 From: Sudeep Holla To: "Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China)" Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Oleg Nesterov , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Richard Weinberger , "jdike@addtoit.com" , Steve Capper , "Bin Lu (Arm Technology China)" , Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] x86: clean up _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling using ptrace_syscall_enter hook Message-ID: <20190314105143.GA15410@e107155-lin> References: <20190228183220.15626-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190228183220.15626-4-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <20190304101205.GA1504@e107155-lin> <96d59a68-e5e2-86d9-c707-a79aad438b76@arm.com> <20190311183403.GA31062@e107155-lin> <65b00ea1-f784-4fb4-2a98-49fa44d9fa8f@arm.com> <20190312120944.GB13825@e107155-lin> <5750cfac-14a7-8eed-09f4-0d53419bea6b@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5750cfac-14a7-8eed-09f4-0d53419bea6b@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 01:03:18AM +0000, Haibo Xu (Arm Technology China) wrote: [...] > Since ptrace() system call do have so many request type, I'm not sure > whether the test cases have covered all of that. But here we'd better make > sure the PTRACE_SYSEMU and PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP requests are work > correctly. May be you can verify them with tests from Bin Lu(bin.lu@arm.com). Sure happy to try them. Can you point me to them ? I did end up writing few more tests. -- Regards, Sudeep