From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: pierre Kuo <vichy.kuo@gmail.com>
Cc: steven.price@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] initrd: move initrd_start calculate within linear mapping range check
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:31:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190319153114.GI59586@arrakis.emea.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190314032047.15790-1-vichy.kuo@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:20:47AM +0800, pierre Kuo wrote:
> in the previous case, initrd_start and initrd_end can be successfully
> returned either (base < memblock_start_of_DRAM()) or (base + size >
> memblock_start_of_DRAM() + linear_region_size).
>
> That means even linear mapping range check fail for initrd_start and
> initrd_end, it still can get virtual address. Here we put
> initrd_start/initrd_end to be calculated only when linear mapping check
> pass.
>
> Fixes: c756c592e442 ("arm64: Utilize phys_initrd_start/phys_initrd_size")
For future versions, please also cc the author of the original commit
you are fixing.
> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: pierre Kuo <vichy.kuo@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - add Fixes tag
>
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 7205a9085b4d..1adf418de685 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -425,6 +425,9 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
> memblock_remove(base, size); /* clear MEMBLOCK_ flags */
> memblock_add(base, size);
> memblock_reserve(base, size);
> + /* the generic initrd code expects virtual addresses */
> + initrd_start = __phys_to_virt(phys_initrd_start);
> + initrd_end = initrd_start + phys_initrd_size;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -450,11 +453,6 @@ void __init arm64_memblock_init(void)
> * pagetables with memblock.
> */
> memblock_reserve(__pa_symbol(_text), _end - _text);
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD) && phys_initrd_size) {
> - /* the generic initrd code expects virtual addresses */
> - initrd_start = __phys_to_virt(phys_initrd_start);
> - initrd_end = initrd_start + phys_initrd_size;
> - }
With CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE we can get a further change to memstart_addr
after the place where you moved the initrd_{start,end} setting, which
would result in a different value for __phys_to_virt(phys_initrd_start).
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-19 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-14 3:20 [PATCH v2 1/1] initrd: move initrd_start calculate within linear mapping range check pierre Kuo
2019-03-18 3:06 ` pierre kuo
2019-03-19 15:31 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2019-03-31 15:14 ` pierre kuo
2019-04-01 14:59 ` pierre kuo
2019-04-01 15:38 ` Will Deacon
2019-04-03 16:44 ` pierre kuo
2019-04-03 17:24 ` Will Deacon
2019-04-03 17:27 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-04-08 16:26 ` pierre kuo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190319153114.GI59586@arrakis.emea.arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=vichy.kuo@gmail.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox